Paper · 2012 · BIOINFOLET - A Quarterly Journal of Life Sciences

Effect of tillage depth and fym levels on growth, yield and yield attributes of onion (Allium cepa linn)

M. R. Gami; M. K. Arvadia; D. D. Patel; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The tillage, up to the depth of 22.5 cm increased bulb yield by 12.99 and 47.24 per cent, respectively over 15 cm and 7.5 cm tillage depth. FYM applied @ 20 and 10 t/ha increased the bulb yield (36.64 and 22.27 per cent respectively) over no FYM.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage to 22.5 cm increased onion bulb yield relative to 15 cm tillage.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa linn)Allium cepat0
Treatment
The tillage, up to the depth of 22.5 cme1
Outcome
bulb yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
12.99 and 47.24 per cent, respectivelye1
Comparator
15 cme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa linn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“The tillage, up to the depth of 22.5 cm increased bulb yield by 12.99 and 47.24 per cent, respectively over 15 cm and 7.5 cm tillage depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage to 22.5 cm increased onion bulb yield relative to 7.5 cm tillage.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa linn)Allium cepat0
Treatment
The tillage, up to the depth of 22.5 cme1
Outcome
bulb yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
12.99 and 47.24 per cent, respectivelye1
Comparator
7.5 cm tillage depthe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa linn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“The tillage, up to the depth of 22.5 cm increased bulb yield by 12.99 and 47.24 per cent, respectively over 15 cm and 7.5 cm tillage depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM applied at 20 and 10 t/ha increased onion bulb yield over no FYM.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa linn)Allium cepat0
Treatment
FYM applied @ 20 and 10 t/hae2
Outcome
bulb yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
36.64 and 22.27 per cent respectivelye2
Comparator
no FYMe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa linn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–104 · show in text ↑
e2

“FYM applied @ 20 and 10 t/ha increased the bulb yield (36.64 and 22.27 per cent respectively) over no FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–245 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.