Abstract
Biorational pest management proved most effective as indicated by lowest population of hopper (3.87, 2.93 and 3.40/twig or panicle), thrips (5.58, 4.50 and 5.04/twig or panicle), leaf gall midge oriented leaf damage (11.70, 10.33 and 11.02%), leaf webber oriented webbing (2.18, 2.63 and 2.41/tree) and fruit fly oriented fruit infestation (6.37, 7.15 and 6.76%) in 2009–10, 2010–11 and pooled results, respectively. Next in the order of effectiveness were entomopathogens against hopper (4.85), thrips (6.92), leaf gall midge (16.92), leaf webber (3.20) and fruit fly (9.52). The treatment with botanicals resulted in significantly higher hopper (6.33), thrips (9.63), leaf gall midge damage (21.78), leaf webber (4.33) and fruit fly (13.67) as compared to the treatments of NPM and entomopathogens. The overall effectiveness of various treatments based was: NPM >Entomopathogens > Botanicals > Control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Biorational pest management gave the lowest hopper population on mango.
- Taxon
- mango
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- Biorational pest managemente1
- Interactor
- hoppere1pest
- Outcome
- population of hoppere1
- Direction
- loweste1
- Value
- 3.87, 2.93 and 3.40/twig or paniclee1
- Comparator
- Controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Biorational pest management in mango”
e1“Biorational pest management proved most effective as indicated by lowest population of hopper (3.87, 2.93 and 3.40/twig or panicle), thrips (5.58, 4.50 and 5.04/twig or panicle), leaf gall midge oriented leaf damage (11.70, 10.33 and 11.02%), leaf webber oriented webbing (2.18, 2.63 and 2.41/tree) and fruit fly oriented fruit infestation (6.37, 7.15 and 6.76%) in 2009–10, 2010–11 and pooled results, respectively”
e2“NPM >Entomopathogens > Botanicals > Control”
Claim · model-written summary
Biorational pest management gave the lowest thrips population on mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- Biorational pest managemente1
- Outcome
- thripse1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 5.58, 4.50 and 5.04/twig or paniclee1
- Comparator
- Controle2
ThripsOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Biorational pest management in mango”
e1“Biorational pest management proved most effective as indicated by lowest population of hopper (3.87, 2.93 and 3.40/twig or panicle), thrips (5.58, 4.50 and 5.04/twig or panicle), leaf gall midge oriented leaf damage (11.70, 10.33 and 11.02%), leaf webber oriented webbing (2.18, 2.63 and 2.41/tree) and fruit fly oriented fruit infestation (6.37, 7.15 and 6.76%) in 2009–10, 2010–11 and pooled results, respectively”
e2“NPM >Entomopathogens > Botanicals > Control”
Claim · model-written summary
Biorational pest management gave the lowest leaf gall midge oriented leaf damage on mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- Biorational pest managemente1
- Interactor
- leaf gall midgee1pest
- Outcome
- leaf gall midge oriented leaf damagee1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 11.70, 10.33 and 11.02%e1
- Comparator
- Controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Biorational pest management in mango”
e1“Biorational pest management proved most effective as indicated by lowest population of hopper (3.87, 2.93 and 3.40/twig or panicle), thrips (5.58, 4.50 and 5.04/twig or panicle), leaf gall midge oriented leaf damage (11.70, 10.33 and 11.02%), leaf webber oriented webbing (2.18, 2.63 and 2.41/tree) and fruit fly oriented fruit infestation (6.37, 7.15 and 6.76%) in 2009–10, 2010–11 and pooled results, respectively”
e2“NPM >Entomopathogens > Botanicals > Control”
Claim · model-written summary
Biorational pest management gave the lowest leaf webber oriented webbing on mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- Biorational pest managemente1
- Interactor
- leaf webbere1pest
- Outcome
- leaf webber oriented webbinge1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 2.18, 2.63 and 2.41/treee1
- Comparator
- Controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Biorational pest management in mango”
e1“Biorational pest management proved most effective as indicated by lowest population of hopper (3.87, 2.93 and 3.40/twig or panicle), thrips (5.58, 4.50 and 5.04/twig or panicle), leaf gall midge oriented leaf damage (11.70, 10.33 and 11.02%), leaf webber oriented webbing (2.18, 2.63 and 2.41/tree) and fruit fly oriented fruit infestation (6.37, 7.15 and 6.76%) in 2009–10, 2010–11 and pooled results, respectively”
e2“NPM >Entomopathogens > Botanicals > Control”
Claim · model-written summary
Biorational pest management gave the lowest fruit fly oriented fruit infestation on mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- Biorational pest managemente1
- Interactor
- fruit flye1pest
- Outcome
- fruit fly oriented fruit infestatione1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 6.37, 7.15 and 6.76%e1
- Comparator
- Controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Biorational pest management in mango”
e1“Biorational pest management proved most effective as indicated by lowest population of hopper (3.87, 2.93 and 3.40/twig or panicle), thrips (5.58, 4.50 and 5.04/twig or panicle), leaf gall midge oriented leaf damage (11.70, 10.33 and 11.02%), leaf webber oriented webbing (2.18, 2.63 and 2.41/tree) and fruit fly oriented fruit infestation (6.37, 7.15 and 6.76%) in 2009–10, 2010–11 and pooled results, respectively”
e2“NPM >Entomopathogens > Botanicals > Control”
Claim · model-written summary
Entomopathogens gave the next lowest hopper population on mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- entomopathogense1
- Interactor
- hoppere1pest
- Second interactor
- entomopathogense1biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- hoppere1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 4.85e1
- Comparator
- Controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Biorational pest management in mango”
e1“Next in the order of effectiveness were entomopathogens against hopper (4.85), thrips (6.92), leaf gall midge (16.92), leaf webber (3.20) and fruit fly (9.52)”
e2“NPM >Entomopathogens > Botanicals > Control”
Claim · model-written summary
Entomopathogens gave the next lowest thrips population on mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- entomopathogense1
- Second interactor
- entomopathogense1biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- thripse1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 6.92e1
- Comparator
- Controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Biorational pest management in mango”
e1“Next in the order of effectiveness were entomopathogens against hopper (4.85), thrips (6.92), leaf gall midge (16.92), leaf webber (3.20) and fruit fly (9.52)”
e2“NPM >Entomopathogens > Botanicals > Control”
Claim · model-written summary
Entomopathogens gave the next lowest leaf gall midge damage on mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- entomopathogense1
- Interactor
- leaf gall midgee1pest
- Second interactor
- entomopathogense1biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- leaf gall midgee1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 16.92e1
- Comparator
- Controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Biorational pest management in mango”
e1“Next in the order of effectiveness were entomopathogens against hopper (4.85), thrips (6.92), leaf gall midge (16.92), leaf webber (3.20) and fruit fly (9.52)”
e2“NPM >Entomopathogens > Botanicals > Control”
Claim · model-written summary
Entomopathogens gave the next lowest leaf webber damage on mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- entomopathogense1
- Interactor
- leaf webbere1pest
- Second interactor
- entomopathogense1biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- leaf webbere1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 3.20e1
- Comparator
- Controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Biorational pest management in mango”
e1“Next in the order of effectiveness were entomopathogens against hopper (4.85), thrips (6.92), leaf gall midge (16.92), leaf webber (3.20) and fruit fly (9.52)”
e2“NPM >Entomopathogens > Botanicals > Control”
Claim · model-written summary
Entomopathogens gave the next lowest fruit fly damage on mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- entomopathogense1
- Interactor
- fruit flye1pest
- Second interactor
- entomopathogense1biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- fruit flye1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 9.52e1
- Comparator
- Controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Biorational pest management in mango”
e1“Next in the order of effectiveness were entomopathogens against hopper (4.85), thrips (6.92), leaf gall midge (16.92), leaf webber (3.20) and fruit fly (9.52)”
e2“NPM >Entomopathogens > Botanicals > Control”
Claim · model-written summary
Botanicals gave significantly higher hopper population than NPM and entomopathogens on mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- botanicalse1
- Interactor
- hoppere1pest
- Outcome
- hoppere1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 6.33e1
- Comparator
- NPM and entomopathogense1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Biorational pest management in mango”
e1“The treatment with botanicals resulted in significantly higher hopper (6.33), thrips (9.63), leaf gall midge damage (21.78), leaf webber (4.33) and fruit fly (13.67) as compared to the treatments of NPM and entomopathogens”
Claim · model-written summary
Botanicals gave significantly higher thrips population than NPM and entomopathogens on mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- botanicalse1
- Outcome
- thripse1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 9.63e1
- Comparator
- NPM and entomopathogense1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Biorational pest management in mango”
e1“The treatment with botanicals resulted in significantly higher hopper (6.33), thrips (9.63), leaf gall midge damage (21.78), leaf webber (4.33) and fruit fly (13.67) as compared to the treatments of NPM and entomopathogens”
Claim · model-written summary
Botanicals gave significantly higher leaf gall midge damage than NPM and entomopathogens on mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- botanicalse1
- Interactor
- leaf gall midgee1pest
- Outcome
- leaf gall midge damagee1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 21.78e1
- Comparator
- NPM and entomopathogense1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Biorational pest management in mango”
e1“The treatment with botanicals resulted in significantly higher hopper (6.33), thrips (9.63), leaf gall midge damage (21.78), leaf webber (4.33) and fruit fly (13.67) as compared to the treatments of NPM and entomopathogens”
Claim · model-written summary
Botanicals gave significantly higher leaf webber population than NPM and entomopathogens on mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- botanicalse1
- Interactor
- leaf webbere1pest
- Outcome
- leaf webbere1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 4.33e1
- Comparator
- NPM and entomopathogense1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Biorational pest management in mango”
e1“The treatment with botanicals resulted in significantly higher hopper (6.33), thrips (9.63), leaf gall midge damage (21.78), leaf webber (4.33) and fruit fly (13.67) as compared to the treatments of NPM and entomopathogens”
Claim · model-written summary
Botanicals gave significantly higher fruit fly population than NPM and entomopathogens on mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- botanicalse1
- Interactor
- fruit flye1pest
- Outcome
- fruit flye1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 13.67e1
- Comparator
- NPM and entomopathogense1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Biorational pest management in mango”
e1“The treatment with botanicals resulted in significantly higher hopper (6.33), thrips (9.63), leaf gall midge damage (21.78), leaf webber (4.33) and fruit fly (13.67) as compared to the treatments of NPM and entomopathogens”
Claim · model-written summary
The overall effectiveness of the treatments ranked NPM above entomopathogens, botanicals and control on mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- NPMe1
- Outcome
- overall effectiveness of various treatmentse1
- Direction
- NPM >Entomopathogens > Botanicals > Controle1
- Comparator
- Controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Biorational pest management in mango”
e1“The overall effectiveness of various treatments based was: NPM >Entomopathogens > Botanicals > Control”
The same questions in other papers
botanical · pest · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →biocontrol · pest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.