Abstract
The study was conducted to determine the effect of different bio-fertilizer on the growth and yield of vegetables and Return on Working Capital in producing pechay and eggplant. Randomized Complete Block was used in the experiment with the following treatments: T1-Control (No Biofertilizer), T2-Commercial Biofertilizer (CB), T3-Vegetable Wastes (VW) + 1MO, T4- Fruit Wastes (FW) + 1 MO, Weeds Stuff (WS + 1 MO, T5-VW + FW + WS (combination) + 1 MO and T6-VW + FW + WS + HM + CM + Trichoderma. Results showed that height, length and width of leaves and number of days from planting to harvesting of pechay were significantly affected by the application of biofertilizer from different sources. Height of eggplant at 15 and 45 days after transplanting, number of days from transplanting to first harvest and number of days from flowering to first harvest were not significantly affected by the different sources of biofertilizers. At 30 days after transplanting, height of eggplant was significantly affected by different biofertilizers applied. The different biofertilizer applied to pechay did not significantly affect the number of marketable plants while those fertilized with biofertilizer from fruit wastes + 1 MO (6,066.60 kg/ha) produced significantly higher yield which is comparable to commercial biofertilizer (6,200 kg/ha) used as check. Yield of eggplant was significantly affected by the application of different biofertilizers produced from farm wastes. Highest yield (6.92 kg) was obtained from plants applied with fruit waste + 1 MO. The application of Weed Stuff + Indigenous Microorganisms and VW + FW + CM + trichoderma gave the highest return on working capital to pechay and eggplant, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer source significantly affected pechay height and leaf dimensions.
- Taxon
- pechayt0
- Treatment
- biofertilizer from different sourcese0
- Outcome
- height, length and width of leavese0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“height, length and width of leaves and number of days from planting to harvesting of pechay were significantly affected by the application of biofertilizer from different sources”
t0“pechay”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer source significantly affected the days from planting to harvesting of pechay.
- Taxon
- pechaye0
- Treatment
- biofertilizer from different sourcese0
- Outcome
- number of days from planting to harvestinge0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“number of days from planting to harvesting of pechay were significantly affected by the application of biofertilizer from different sources”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer source did not significantly affect eggplant height at 15 and 45 days after transplanting.
- Taxon
- eggplant
Solanum melongenae0 - Treatment
- different sources of biofertilizerse0
- Outcome
- Heighte0
- Qualifier
- at 15 and 45 days after transplantinge0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Height of eggplant at 15 and 45 days after transplanting, number of days from transplanting to first harvest and number of days from flowering to first harvest were not significantly affected by the different sources of biofertilizers”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer source did not significantly affect eggplant days from transplanting or flowering to first harvest.
- Taxon
- eggplantSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- different sources of biofertilizerse0
- Outcome
- number of days from transplanting to first harvest and number of days from flowering to first harveste0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of days from transplanting to first harvest and number of days from flowering to first harvest were not significantly affected by the different sources of biofertilizers”
t0“eggplant”
Claim · model-written summary
At 30 days after transplanting, biofertilizer treatment significantly affected eggplant height.
- Taxon
- eggplantSolanum melongenae0
- Treatment
- different biofertilizers appliede0
- Outcome
- heighte0
- Qualifier
- At 30 days after transplantinge0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At 30 days after transplanting, height of eggplant was significantly affected by different biofertilizers applied”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer did not significantly affect the number of marketable pechay plants.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“The different biofertilizer applied to pechay did not significantly affect the number of marketable plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit-waste biofertilizer with 1 MO yielded 6,066.60 kg/ha of pechay, significantly higher and comparable to the commercial check.
Verbatim
e0“those fertilized with biofertilizer from fruit wastes + 1 MO (6,066.60 kg/ha) produced significantly higher yield which is comparable to commercial biofertilizer (6,200 kg/ha) used as check”
t0“pechay”
Claim · model-written summary
Farm-waste biofertilizers significantly affected eggplant yield.
- Taxon
- eggplantSolanum melongenae0
- Treatment
- different biofertilizers produced from farm wastese0
- Outcome
- Yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield of eggplant was significantly affected by the application of different biofertilizers produced from farm wastes”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit-waste biofertilizer with 1 MO gave the highest eggplant yield of 6.92 kg.
- Taxon
- eggplantSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- fruit waste + 1 MOe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- Higheste0
- Value
- 6.92 kge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Highest yield (6.92 kg) was obtained from plants applied with fruit waste + 1 MO”
t0“eggplant”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed Stuff plus Indigenous Microorganisms gave the highest return on working capital for pechay.
- Taxon
- pechaye0
- Treatment
- Weed Stuff + Indigenous Microorganismse0
- Outcome
- return on working capitale0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The application of Weed Stuff + Indigenous Microorganisms and VW + FW + CM + trichoderma gave the highest return on working capital to pechay and eggplant, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
VW + FW + CM + trichoderma gave the highest return on working capital for eggplant.
- Taxon
- eggplantSolanum melongenae0
- Treatment
- VW + FW + CM + trichodermae0
- Interactor
- trichoderma
Trichodermae0symbiont - Outcome
- return on working capitale0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of Weed Stuff + Indigenous Microorganisms and VW + FW + CM + trichoderma gave the highest return on working capital to pechay and eggplant, respectively”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →inoculation · growth · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.