Paper · 1990

Evaluation of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl for post-emergence weed control in lowland transplanted rice

L. E. Fabro; Carmela Evangelista

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted from 1988 to 1989 to evaluate the efficacy of fenoxaprop as a post-emergence herbicide in transplanted, lowland rice. Results showed that application of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 30 g ai/ha at the 3 to 5 leaf stage of annual grasses or at 16 to 21 days after transplanting rice seedlings provided excellent control of Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) P. Beauv and E. glabrescens Munro ex Hook.f. Broadleaf weeds and sedges were not affected. Tank-mixed application with 2,4-D IBE (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid isobutyl ester) or sulfonyl urea resulted in broad spectrum weed control and higher significant yields. Likewise, follow-up treatment with 2,4-D IBE or sulfonyl urea were equally effective. Better results were obtained when treatment was made at saturated field condition than with 3 to 5 cm standing water. Three days after herbicide application (DAA), rice seedlings showed chlorosis of the base of the youngest leaves, sporadic chlorotic spots in older leaves and slight burning of leaf tips. Crop phytotoxicity ranged from 5 to 10% which peaked at 7 DAA with 15 to 25%. Chlorosis did not progress further and plants developed normal green leaves toward 14 DAA. Initial crop injury did not affect the yield of rice which suggests the feasibility of using fenoxaprop-p-ethyl for post-emergence weed control in lowland, transplanted rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl gave excellent control of Echinochloa crusgalli.

Treatment
fenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 30 g ai/hae0
Interactor
Echinochloa crusgalliEchinochloa crus-gallie0weed
Outcome
control of Echinochloa crusgallie0
Direction
excellente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 30 g ai/ha at the 3 to 5 leaf stage of annual grasses or at 16 to 21 days after transplanting rice seedlings provided excellent control of Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) P. Beauv”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–378 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl gave excellent control of E. glabrescens.

Treatment
fenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 30 g ai/hae0
Interactor
E. glabrescensEchinochloa glabrescense0weed
Outcome
control of Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) P. Beauv and E. glabrescense0
Direction
excellente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 30 g ai/ha at the 3 to 5 leaf stage of annual grasses or at 16 to 21 days after transplanting rice seedlings provided excellent control of Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) P. Beauv and E. glabrescens Munro ex Hook.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–414 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadleaf weeds and sedges were unaffected.

Treatment
fenoxaprop-p-ethyle1
Interactor
Broadleaf weeds and sedgese0weed
Outcome
Broadleaf weeds and sedgese0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broadleaf weeds and sedges were not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 30 g ai/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–214 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mixing with 2,4-D IBE or sulfonyl urea broadened weed control.

Treatment
Tank-mixed application with 2,4-D IBE (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid isobutyl ester) or sulfonyl ureae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
broad spectrume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tank-mixed application with 2,4-D IBE (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid isobutyl ester) or sulfonyl urea resulted in broad spectrum weed control and higher significant yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mixing with 2,4-D IBE or sulfonyl urea raised rice yield significantly.

Treatment
Tank-mixed application with 2,4-D IBE (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid isobutyl ester) or sulfonyl ureae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tank-mixed application with 2,4-D IBE (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid isobutyl ester) or sulfonyl urea resulted in broad spectrum weed control and higher significant yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Follow-up 2,4-D IBE or sulfonyl urea treatment was equally effective.

Treatment
follow-up treatment with 2,4-D IBE or sulfonyl ureae0
Outcome
equally effectivee0
Direction
equally effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“follow-up treatment with 2,4-D IBE or sulfonyl urea were equally effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saturated field conditions produced better herbicide results than standing water.

Treatment
saturated field conditione0
Outcome
Better resultse0
Direction
Bettere0
Comparator
3 to 5 cm standing watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Better results were obtained when treatment was made at saturated field condition than with 3 to 5 cm standing water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice seedlings showed leaf chlorosis and tip burning three days after herbicide application.

Outcome
chlorosis of the base of the youngest leaves, sporadic chlorotic spots in older leaves and slight burning of leaf tipse0
Qualifier
Three days after herbicide applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three days after herbicide application (DAA), rice seedlings showed chlorosis of the base of the youngest leaves, sporadic chlorotic spots in older leaves and slight burning of leaf tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1025 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop phytotoxicity initially ranged from 5 to 10%.

Outcome
Crop phytotoxicitye0
Value
5 to 10%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop phytotoxicity ranged from 5 to 10% which peaked at 7 DAA with 15 to 25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop phytotoxicity peaked at 15 to 25% at seven days.

Outcome
Crop phytotoxicitye0
Direction
peakede0
Value
15 to 25%e0
Qualifier
7 DAAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop phytotoxicity ranged from 5 to 10% which peaked at 7 DAA with 15 to 25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorosis stopped progressing and normal green leaves formed by day 14.

Outcome
Chlorosis did not progress further and plants developed normal green leavese0
Qualifier
14 DAAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorosis did not progress further and plants developed normal green leaves toward 14 DAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial crop injury did not reduce rice yield.

Treatment
Initial crop injurye0
Outcome
yield of ricee0
Direction
did not affecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Initial crop injury did not affect the yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1248 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider fenoxaprop-p-ethyl feasible for post-emergence weed control in rice.

Outcome
using fenoxaprop-p-ethyl for post-emergence weed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“feasibility of using fenoxaprop-p-ethyl for post-emergence weed control in lowland, transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1369 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 52 positive, 10 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.