Abstract
Field experiments were conducted in two crop seasons during 2010–11 to study management of peanut stem necrosis disease in field condition. Among ten treatments tested in two seasons during Rabi 2010–2011 and Kharif 2011, treatment T9 with combination of seed treatment with imidacloprid, removal of weeds, border crop with maize, intercrop with red gram and dimethoate spray @ 2 ml/l recorded zero per cent disease incidence. This treatment followed by seed treatment with imidacloprid @ 1 ml/kg of seed+ Removal of TSV susceptible weeds+ Spray with dimethoate @ 2 ml/l 30 days after sowing recorded 1.8% disease incidence.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T9, combining imidacloprid seed treatment, weed removal, border maize, red gram intercropping and dimethoate spray, gave zero per cent peanut stem necrosis disease incidence
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- combination of seed treatment with imidacloprid, removal of weeds, border crop with maize, intercrop with red gram and dimethoate spray @ 2 ml/le1
- Outcome
- disease incidencee1
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede1
- Value
- zero per cente1
- Setting
- field conditione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field experiments were conducted in two crop seasons during 2010–11 to study management of peanut stem necrosis disease in field condition”
e1“treatment T9 with combination of seed treatment with imidacloprid, removal of weeds, border crop with maize, intercrop with red gram and dimethoate spray @ 2 ml/l recorded zero per cent disease incidence”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid seed treatment, weed removal and dimethoate spray 30 days after sowing gave 1.8% peanut stem necrosis disease incidence
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- seed treatment with imidacloprid @ 1 ml/kg of seed+ Removal of TSV susceptible weeds+ Spray with dimethoate @ 2 ml/l 30 days after sowinge2
- Outcome
- disease incidencee2
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede2
- Value
- 1.8%e2
- Setting
- field conditione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field experiments were conducted in two crop seasons during 2010–11 to study management of peanut stem necrosis disease in field condition”
e2“seed treatment with imidacloprid @ 1 ml/kg of seed+ Removal of TSV susceptible weeds+ Spray with dimethoate @ 2 ml/l 30 days after sowing recorded 1.8% disease incidence”
The same questions in other papers
Zea mays · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
imidacloprid · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →dimethoate · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
intercropping · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →seed treatment · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →application · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.