Paper · 2010 · Acta Horticulturae

HISTOLOGICAL AND POMOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF SCLEREID CELL CLUSTERS IN SOME IRANIAN LOCAL AND EUROPEAN PEAR CULTIVARS

F.T. Hagh; H. Abdollahi

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sclereid cell clusters are a significant character of pear fruits, both in Asian (Pyrus pyrifolia) and European cultivars (P. communis). The dispersal and form of sclereid clusters affects texture and fruit quality of pear cultivars. This research was carried out to evaluate histological and pomological characterization of 5 local, 19 exogenous (European) and 4 unknown pear cultivars from the Iranian National Pyrus Collection, established in Karaj. Histological evaluation of sclereids was performed microscopically by new-methylene blue staining of fruit tissue. The pomological evaluation of fruits was based on the UPOV descriptor and their correlations with sclereids characterizations were statistically determined. Among tested cultivars, two cultivars, 'Felestini' and 'Red Bartlett', showed the lowest and highest sclereid cluster per sample, while two cultivars, 'Felestini' and 'Shahak' demonstrated the lowest and highest sclereid cell per cluster, respectively. The fruit size and volume had high correlation with sclereid cluster density; accordingly genetically small fruit-bearing cultivars demonstrated higher sclereid density. The results also revealed that sclereid differentiation occurs in primary fruit development phase, before cell division termination that usually in pear fruits is not longer than 60 days. Therefore, more cell enlargement inducing condition result in a decrease in the sclereid density in pear fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Felestini had the fewest sclereid clusters per sample.

Material
'Felestini'e0
Outcome
sclereid cluster per samplee0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Felestini' and 'Red Bartlett', showed the lowest and highest sclereid cluster per sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–853 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality of pear cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–232 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red Bartlett had the most sclereid clusters per sample.

Material
'Red Bartlett'e0
Outcome
sclereid cluster per samplee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Felestini' and 'Red Bartlett', showed the lowest and highest sclereid cluster per sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–853 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality of pear cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–232 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Felestini had the fewest sclereid cells per cluster.

Material
'Felestini'e0
Outcome
sclereid cell per clustere0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Felestini' and 'Shahak' demonstrated the lowest and highest sclereid cell per cluster”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–962 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality of pear cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–232 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shahak had the most sclereid cells per cluster.

Material
'Shahak'e0
Outcome
sclereid cell per clustere0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Felestini' and 'Shahak' demonstrated the lowest and highest sclereid cell per cluster”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–962 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality of pear cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–232 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit size and volume correlated strongly with sclereid cluster density.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
sclereid cluster densitye0
Qualifier
high correlatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit size and volume had high correlation with sclereid cluster density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality of pear cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–232 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetically small-fruited cultivars had higher sclereid density.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
sclereid densitye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genetically small fruit-bearing cultivars demonstrated higher sclereid density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1146 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality of pear cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–232 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sclereids differentiated in the primary phase of pear fruit development before cell division ceased.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
sclereid differentiatione0
Value
60 dayse0
Qualifier
before cell division terminatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sclereid differentiation occurs in primary fruit development phase, before cell division termination that usually in pear fruits is not longer than 60 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1335 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conditions inducing more cell enlargement were interpreted to decrease sclereid density.

Outcome
sclereid densitye0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
more cell enlargement inducing conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more cell enlargement inducing condition result in a decrease in the sclereid density in pear fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1448 · show in text ↑