Paper · 2003 · Journal of Entomological Research

IPM module against pest complex of pearl millet

Prem Kishore; Apurba K. Barman

1
claims
2
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Incidence and damage of shootfly and stem borer vary in time and space and is reflected in low grain yields of pearl millet at farmers fields. An IPM schedule was tested against shootfly and stem borer. Results indicated that seed treatment with Gaucho 70WS 5 g/kg seed + Neem oil 5% spray at 30 DAG + endosulfan 4% dust at 50% flowering gave maximum yield and was superior to farmer's practice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated seed, neem oil and endosulfan treatment gave maximum pearl millet grain yield and exceeded farmer practice.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
seed treatment with Gaucho 70WS 5 g/kg seed + Neem oil 5% spray at 30 DAG + endosulfan 4% dust at 50% floweringe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
farmer's practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with Gaucho 70WS 5 g/kg seed + Neem oil 5% spray at 30 DAG + endosulfan 4% dust at 50% flowering gave maximum yield and was superior to farmer's practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–394 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑

endosulfan · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

27 papers: 23 positive, 4 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

stage · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

botanical · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 59 positive, 2 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.