Paper · 2016 · Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (University of Kassel)

Effects of shoot pruning and inflorescence thinning on plant growth, yield and fruit quality of greenhouse tomatoes in a tropical climate

Max, Johannes F.J.; Schmidt, Lilian; Mutwiwa, Urbanus N.; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
17
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The combined effects of shoot pruning (one or two stems) and inflorescence thinning (five or ten flowers per inflorescence) on greenhouse tomato yield and fruit quality were studied during the dry season (DS) and rainy season (RS) in Central Thailand. Poor fruit set, development of undersized (mostly parthenocarpic) fruits, as well as the physiological disorders blossom-end rot (BER) and fruit cracking (FC) turned out to be the prevailing causes deteriorating fruit yield and quality. The proportion of marketable fruits was less than 10 % in the RS and around 65 % in the DS. In both seasons, total yield was significantly increased when plants were cultivated with two stems, resulting in higher marketable yields only in the DS. While the fraction of undersized fruits was increased in both seasons when plants were grown with a secondary stem, the proportions of BER and FC were significantly reduced. Restricting the number of flowers per inflorescence invariably resulted in reduced total yield. However, in neither season did fruit load considerably affect quantity or proportion of the marketable yield fraction. Inflorescence thinning tended to promote BER and FC, an effect which was only significant for BER in the RS. In conclusion, for greenhouse tomato production under climate conditions as they are prevalent in Central Thailand, the cultivation with two stems appears to be highly recommendable whereas the measures to control fruit load tested in this study did not proof to be advisable.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poor fruit set, undersized fruits, blossom-end rot and fruit cracking were the prevailing causes of lower yield and quality.

Outcome
fruit yield and qualitye0
Qualifier
undersized (mostly parthenocarpic) fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poor fruit set, development of undersized (mostly parthenocarpic) fruits, as well as the physiological disorders blossom-end rot (BER) and fruit cracking (FC) turned out to be the prevailing causes deteriorating fruit yield and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–488 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable fruits comprised less than 10 % in the rainy season and around 65 % in the dry season.

Outcome
proportion of marketable fruitse0
Value
less than 10 %e0
Qualifier
around 65 %e0
Comparator
DSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proportion of marketable fruits was less than 10 % in the RS and around 65 % in the DS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–580 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two stems significantly increased total yield in both seasons.

Treatment
two stemse0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both seasons, total yield was significantly increased when plants were cultivated with two stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two stems increased marketable yield only in the dry season.

Treatment
two stemse1
Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
only in the DSe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in higher marketable yields only in the DS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants were cultivated with two stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A secondary stem increased the fraction of undersized fruits in both seasons.

Treatment
a secondary steme0
Outcome
fraction of undersized fruitse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fraction of undersized fruits was increased in both seasons when plants were grown with a secondary stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A secondary stem significantly reduced blossom-end rot and fruit cracking proportions.

Treatment
a secondary steme1
Outcome
proportions of BER and FCe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the proportions of BER and FC were significantly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants were grown with a secondary stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Restricting flowers per inflorescence reduced total yield.

Treatment
Restricting the number of flowers per inflorescencee0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Restricting the number of flowers per inflorescence invariably resulted in reduced total yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit load did not considerably affect the quantity or proportion of marketable yield in either season.

Treatment
fruit loade0
Outcome
quantity or proportion of the marketable yield fractione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in neither season did fruit load considerably affect quantity or proportion of the marketable yield fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inflorescence thinning tended to promote blossom-end rot and fruit cracking, significantly for blossom-end rot in the rainy season.

Treatment
Inflorescence thinninge0
Outcome
BER and FCe0
Direction
promotee0
Qualifier
only significant for BER in the RSe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inflorescence thinning tended to promote BER and FC, an effect which was only significant for BER in the RS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors do not advise the tested fruit-load control measures.

Outcome
measures to control fruit loade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the measures to control fruit load tested in this study did not proof to be advisable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑

pruning · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 8 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.