Abstract
Pigeonpea based intercropping systems gave significantly higher pigeonpea equivalent yield as compared with sole cropping. The gross monetary return was maximum with pigeonpea + Mungbean (1:2) intercropping system.Application of vermicompost@ 2.5 t ha−1 was found less remunerative than FYM @ 5.0 t ha−1. Higher net monetary return (NMR) was recorded due to the application of 100% RDF.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea intercropping systems gave significantly higher pigeonpea equivalent yield than sole cropping.
- Taxon
- Pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane0 - Treatment
- intercropping systemse0
- Outcome
- pigeonpea equivalent yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- sole croppinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pigeonpea based intercropping systems gave significantly higher pigeonpea equivalent yield as compared with sole cropping.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea and Mungbean intercropping at 1:2 had the maximum gross monetary return.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- pigeonpea + Mungbean (1:2) intercropping systeme0
- Outcome
- gross monetary returne0
- Direction
- maximume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The gross monetary return was maximum with pigeonpea + Mungbean (1:2) intercropping system.”
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost at 2.5 t ha−1 was less remunerative than FYM at 5.0 t ha−1.
Verbatim
t0“pigonpea”
e0“Application of vermicompost@ 2.5 t ha−1 was found less remunerative than FYM @ 5.0 t ha−1.”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 100% RDF gave higher net monetary return.
- Taxon
- pigonpeat0
- Treatment
- application of 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- net monetary return (NMR)e0
- Direction
- Highere0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“pigonpea”
e0“Higher net monetary return (NMR) was recorded due to the application of 100% RDF.”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ
93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
113 papers more in this group
See all 117 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.