Paper · 2015 · DergiPark (Istanbul University)

Antioxidant Activity of Some Dried Autochthonous Albanian Fig (Ficus carica) Cultivars

Luziana Hoxha; Renata Kongoli; Migena Hoxha

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to evaluate the phytochemical character and total antioxidant capacity of sun-dried autochthonous fig cultivars commercially most known in Albania. Samples of five fig cultivars such as Roshnik, Rotllar, Bishtgjati, Melacak, and Perdhikuli, respectively cultivated in Berat, Tirana, Elbasan, Shkodra and Himara in Albania, were taken under consideration. The methanol extracts of dried fruits of each autochthonous fig cultivars were analysed to determine their total polyphenols content, anthocyanin and flavonoids content; the antioxidant activity using DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl) and ABTS (2,2'-azinobis- (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid), was evaluated too. The data obtained showed that the samples had total polyphenols content varied from 45.24-160.42 GAE mg/100 g DW of sample, the anthocyanin from 0.0-5.32 mg cyn-3-glu/100 g DW of the sample and flavonoids from 18.31-36.95 mg (+) catechin/100 g DW of the sample. Antioxidant activity expressed as DPPH varied from 387-825 mol TE/100 g DW of sample, while ABTS values ranged from 309-886 mol AAE/100 g DW of sample. The results of this study are the first data published for autochthonous Albanian fig cultivars, and showed that the selected dried figs are a good source of antioxidants. There were seen significant differences between dark and light fig cultivars in total polyphenolic, total flavonoid, total anthocyanin content, and antioxidant capacity. The data obtained are similar to other studies about sun dried figs. Key words: Antioxidants, Autochthonous, ABTS, DPPH, Dried fig

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total polyphenols in dried fig samples ranged from 45.24 to 160.42 GAE mg/100 g dry weight.

Taxon
Figt0
Organ / stage
Figt0
Outcome
total polyphenols contente0
Value
45.24-160.42 GAE mg/100 g DWe0

Verbatim

e0

“total polyphenols content varied from 45.24-160.42 GAE mg/100 g DW of sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fig (Ficus carica) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthocyanin in dried fig samples ranged from 0.0 to 5.32 mg cyn-3-glu/100 g dry weight.

Taxon
Figt0
Outcome
anthocyanine0
Value
0.0-5.32 mg cyn-3-glu/100 g DWe0

Verbatim

e0

“the anthocyanin from 0.0-5.32 mg cyn-3-glu/100 g DW of the sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fig (Ficus carica) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavonoids in dried fig samples ranged from 18.31 to 36.95 mg catechin equivalent per 100 g dry weight.

Taxon
Figt0
Outcome
flavonoidse0
Value
18.31-36.95 mg (+) catechin/100 g DWe0

Verbatim

e0

“flavonoids from 18.31-36.95 mg (+) catechin/100 g DW of the sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fig (Ficus carica) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPPH antioxidant activity of dried fig samples ranged from 387 to 825 mol TE/100 g dry weight.

Taxon
Figt0
Outcome
Antioxidant activity expressed as DPPHe0
Value
387-825 mol TE/100 g DWe0

Verbatim

e0

“Antioxidant activity expressed as DPPH varied from 387-825 mol TE/100 g DW of sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fig (Ficus carica) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABTS antioxidant values of dried fig samples ranged from 309 to 886 mol AAE/100 g dry weight.

Taxon
Figt0
Outcome
ABTS valuese0
Value
309-886 mol AAE/100 g DWe0

Verbatim

e0

“ABTS values ranged from 309-886 mol AAE/100 g DW of sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fig (Ficus carica) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–86 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected dried figs were considered a good source of antioxidants.

Taxon
figsFicuse0
Outcome
good source of antioxidantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus
Ficus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)איתן פרמן 14:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the selected dried figs are a good source of antioxidants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1298 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark and light fig cultivars differed significantly in total polyphenolic and flavonoid content.

Taxon
fig cultivarse0
Outcome
total polyphenolic, total flavonoide0
Comparator
dark and light fig cultivarse0

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences between dark and light fig cultivars in total polyphenolic, total flavonoid, total anthocyanin content, and antioxidant capacity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1469 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark and light fig cultivars differed significantly in total anthocyanin content and antioxidant capacity.

Taxon
fig cultivarse0
Outcome
total anthocyanin content, and antioxidant capacitye0
Comparator
dark and light fig cultivarse0

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences between dark and light fig cultivars in total polyphenolic, total flavonoid, total anthocyanin content, and antioxidant capacity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1469 · show in text ↑