Paper · 2007 · Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF NEEM CAKE, VERMICOMPOST AND GREEN MANURE ON SUCKING PESTS OF CHILLI

R. S. Giraddi; T. Verghese

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at UAS, Dharwad, Karnataka, S. India during 2003 and 2005 to study the effect of neem cake, vermicompost and green manure (sunnhemp, Crotolaria juncea) at three levels on the activity of chilli thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood) and mite (Polyphagotarsonemus latus Banks)., extent of crop damage and yield. The results of two years and pooled analyses indicated that crop amended at planting with neem cake (1000 kg/ha) and vermicompost (2500 kg/ha) were effective in keeping the sucking pests density in check, being comparable to recommended insecticides (dimethoate 30 EC and dicofol 18.5 EC two sprays each). Sunnhemp green manuring at higher dosage (1000 kg/ha) was next in the order of effectiveness. These organics at lower dosages were found inferior to chemical check. Similar trend of efficacy of organics was seen in managing leaf curl manifestations too. Significantly highest red chilli yield was registered in the crop receiving neem cake at 1000 kg/ha (5.68 q/ha), being comparable to recommended insecticides (6.14 q/ha). This was followed by vermicompost at 2500 kg/ha (4.94 q/ha). Untreated crop yielded significantly lowest at 2.20 q/ha red chillies. The research highlights the utility of organics in managing sucking pests of byadagi chilli, that has potential export value.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake at 1000 kg/ha suppressed sucking pest density comparably to insecticides.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
neem cake (1000 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
sucking pests densitye0
Direction
in checke0
Comparator
recommended insecticidese0

Verbatim

e0

“crop amended at planting with neem cake (1000 kg/ha) and vermicompost (2500 kg/ha) were effective in keeping the sucking pests density in check, being comparable to recommended insecticides (dimethoate 30 EC and dicofol 18.5 EC two sprays each).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHILLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 2500 kg/ha suppressed sucking pest density comparably to insecticides.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
vermicompost (2500 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
sucking pests densitye0
Direction
in checke0
Comparator
recommended insecticidese0

Verbatim

e0

“crop amended at planting with neem cake (1000 kg/ha) and vermicompost (2500 kg/ha) were effective in keeping the sucking pests density in check, being comparable to recommended insecticides (dimethoate 30 EC and dicofol 18.5 EC two sprays each).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHILLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunnhemp green manuring at 1000 kg/ha ranked next in pest control effectiveness.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
Sunnhemp green manuring at higher dosage (1000 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
next in the order of effectivenesse0
Direction
next in the order of effectivenesse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sunnhemp green manuring at higher dosage (1000 kg/ha) was next in the order of effectiveness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHILLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower organic doses were inferior to chemical check.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
organics at lower dosagese0
Outcome
inferiore0
Direction
inferiore0
Comparator
chemical checke0

Verbatim

e0

“These organics at lower dosages were found inferior to chemical check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHILLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic treatments showed a similar pattern for leaf curl management.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
organicse0
Outcome
leaf curl manifestationse0
Direction
Similar trende0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trend of efficacy of organics was seen in managing leaf curl manifestations too.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHILLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake at 1000 kg/ha produced the highest red chilli yield, 5.68 q/ha.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
neem cake at 1000 kg/hae0
Outcome
red chilli yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.68 q/hae0
Comparator
recommended insecticidese0

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly highest red chilli yield was registered in the crop receiving neem cake at 1000 kg/ha (5.68 q/ha), being comparable to recommended insecticides (6.14 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHILLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 2500 kg/ha yielded 4.94 q/ha red chilli.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
vermicompost at 2500 kg/hae0
Outcome
followede0
Direction
followede0
Value
4.94 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This was followed by vermicompost at 2500 kg/ha (4.94 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHILLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated chilli had the lowest yield, 2.20 q/ha.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
Untreatede0
Outcome
red chilliese0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.20 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Untreated crop yielded significantly lowest at 2.20 q/ha red chillies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHILLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑

fertilization · pest · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

botanical · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

botanical · pest · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.