Paper · 2010 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

A combination of gum arabic and chitosan can control anthracnose caused byColletotrichum musaeand enhance the shelf-life of banana fruit

Mehdi Maqbool; Asgar Ali; PeteR Alderson

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
44
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryAnthracnose, caused by Colletotrichum musae, is the major disease affecting the quality of banana fruit during storage. To control banana anthracnose, the combined effects of coatings with gum arabic [GA; at 5, 10, 15 or 20% (w/v)] and 0.75% (w/v) chitosan (CH) were investigated and compared to untreated controls. In vitro results showed significant (P < 0.05) inhibition of mycelial growth and conidial germination of C. musae in all combined treatments compared to the untreated controls after 7 d of incubation at room temperature (25°C). However, potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates amended with 10% (w/v) GA gave the most promising results among all test treatments in suppressing mycelial growth (86%) and inhibiting conidial germination (80%), while no effective inhibition of conidial germination was observed in the controls. In vivo results confirmed that 10% (w/v) GA was the optimum concentration to control fruit decay (70%), while showing efficacy on the reduction of growth of C. musae on artificially inoculated banana fruit. The combined coatings of GA + CH also significantly delayed ripening in terms of weight loss, fruit firmness, soluble solids content, and titratable acidity. These results support the possibility of using 10% (w/v) GA combined with 0.75% (w/v) CH as an alternative strategy to control post-harvest anthracnose disease in banana fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All combined gum arabic and chitosan coatings significantly inhibited C. musae mycelial growth against controls after seven days.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
all combined treatmentse0
Interactor
C. musaeColletotrichum musaee0pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Qualifier
after 7 d of incubation at room temperature (25°C)e0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum musae
Colletotrichum musae · InteractorPlant pests and diseases · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro results showed significant (P < 0.05) inhibition of mycelial growth and conidial germination of C. musae in all combined treatments compared to the untreated controls after 7 d of incubation at room temperature (25°C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–549 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All combined coatings significantly inhibited C. musae conidial germination against controls after seven days.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
all combined treatmentse0
Interactor
C. musaeColletotrichum musaee0pathogen
Outcome
conidial germination of C. musaee0
Direction
inhibitione0
Qualifier
after 7 d of incubation at room temperature (25°C)e0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum musae
Colletotrichum musae · InteractorPlant pests and diseases · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro results showed significant (P < 0.05) inhibition of mycelial growth and conidial germination of C. musae in all combined treatments compared to the untreated controls after 7 d of incubation at room temperature (25°C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–549 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% gum arabic suppressed mycelial growth by 86%, the strongest result among treatments.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
10% (w/v) GAe0
Outcome
mycelial growthe0
Direction
suppressinge0
Value
86%e0
Comparator
all test treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates amended with 10% (w/v) GA gave the most promising results among all test treatments in suppressing mycelial growth (86%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% gum arabic inhibited conidial germination by 80%, the strongest result among treatments.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
10% (w/v) GAe0
Outcome
conidial germinatione0
Direction
inhibitinge0
Value
80%e0
Comparator
all test treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“10% (w/v) GA gave the most promising results among all test treatments in suppressing mycelial growth (86%) and inhibiting conidial germination (80%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–136 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controls showed no effective inhibition of conidial germination.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
inhibition of conidial germinatione0
Direction
no effective inhibitione0
Qualifier
controlse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“no effective inhibition of conidial germination was observed in the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% gum arabic was the optimum tested concentration for controlling fruit decay, at 70%.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
10% (w/v) GAe0
Outcome
fruit decaye0
Direction
controle0
Value
70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“10% (w/v) GA was the optimum concentration to control fruit decay (70%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% gum arabic reduced C. musae growth on inoculated banana fruit.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
10% (w/v) GAe0
Interactor
C. musaeColletotrichum musaee0pathogen
Outcome
growth of C. musaee0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
artificially inoculated banana fruite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum musae
Colletotrichum musae · InteractorPlant pests and diseases · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10% (w/v) GA was the optimum concentration to control fruit decay (70%), while showing efficacy on the reduction of growth of C. musae on artificially inoculated banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined GA and CH coatings significantly delayed banana fruit ripening as measured by weight loss, firmness, and soluble solids content.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
combined coatings of GA + CHe0
Outcome
weight loss, fruit firmness, soluble solids contente0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The combined coatings of GA + CH also significantly delayed ripening in terms of weight loss, fruit firmness, soluble solids content, and titratable acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined GA and CH coatings significantly delayed ripening as measured by titratable acidity.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
combined coatings of GA + CHe0
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The combined coatings of GA + CH also significantly delayed ripening in terms of weight loss, fruit firmness, soluble solids content, and titratable acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–136 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose 10% GA with 0.75% CH as an alternative for postharvest banana anthracnose control.

Taxon
bananae0
Outcome
using 10% (w/v) GA combined with 0.75% (w/v) CH as an alternative strategy to control post-harvest anthracnose diseasee0

Verbatim

e0

“These results support the possibility of using 10% (w/v) GA combined with 0.75% (w/v) CH as an alternative strategy to control post-harvest anthracnose disease in banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1382 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · disease · MusaResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: sugar starch · MusaResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

chitosan · quality: sugar starch · MusaResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.