Paper · 2015 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Impact of Trichoderma viride culture filtrate and organic substrate against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on brinjal.

Pintoo Kumar; Ramesh Chand

15
claims
31
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In vitro effect of Trichoderma viride culture filtrate against Meloidogyne incognita revealed that egg hatching inhibition and larval mortality was observed at all culture filtrate concentrations. The hatching inhibition effect and the larval mortality was found to be increased with the increase in culture filtrate concentration and recorded lowest at lowest concentration and maximum at maximum concentration. Highest plant height, root length and nematode multiplication was observed best in T6 treatment (18.50, 7.50 & 6.64), respectively followed by T5, T4, and T3, T2 and T1 treatment in descending order. Among organic amendded treatments, cow dung treatment (T4) and goat dung treatment was observed best for nematode management, plant growth and multiplication. The maximum hatching and mortality reduction was (12.75, 23.00, 42.25, 53.75 71.00 & 80.00) and (167.50, 157.25, 140.00, 123.25, 45.25 with minimum reduction in control 172.75 at 48 hrs of incubation, respectively. In vivo effect of antagonistic fungus was recorded with or without organic manure (vermicompost, cow dung, goat dung manure and poultry manure) on the nematode multiplication. The multiplication reduction % over the inoculated check was maximum in treated check T8, (85.09) followed by T1(69.88) T4(69.13) T2(68.82) T3, (68.37) and T5(52.71) treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride filtrate inhibited Meloidogyne incognita egg hatching at every concentration.

Treatment
Trichoderma viride culture filtratee0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Second interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
egg hatching inhibitione0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · Second interactorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro effect of Trichoderma viride culture filtrate against Meloidogyne incognita revealed that egg hatching inhibition and larval mortality was observed at all culture filtrate concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–196 · show in text ↑
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride filtrate caused Meloidogyne incognita larval mortality at every concentration.

Treatment
Trichoderma viride culture filtratee0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Second interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
larval mortalitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · Second interactorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro effect of Trichoderma viride culture filtrate against Meloidogyne incognita revealed that egg hatching inhibition and larval mortality was observed at all culture filtrate concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–196 · show in text ↑
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–128 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hatching inhibition increased as filtrate concentration rose.

Treatment
culture filtrate concentratione0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
hatching inhibition effecte0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hatching inhibition effect and the larval mortality was found to be increased with the increase in culture filtrate concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–128 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larval mortality increased as filtrate concentration rose.

Treatment
culture filtrate concentratione0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
larval mortalitye0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hatching inhibition effect and the larval mortality was found to be increased with the increase in culture filtrate concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 produced the highest plant height, 18.50.

Treatment
T6 treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
18.50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest plant height, root length and nematode multiplication was observed best in T6 treatment (18.50, 7.50 & 6.64), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 produced the highest root length, 7.50.

Treatment
T6 treatmente0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
7.50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest plant height, root length and nematode multiplication was observed best in T6 treatment (18.50, 7.50 & 6.64), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 had the highest nematode multiplication, 6.64.

Treatment
T6 treatmente0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
nematode multiplicatione0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
6.64e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest plant height, root length and nematode multiplication was observed best in T6 treatment (18.50, 7.50 & 6.64), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow dung treatment performed best for nematode management, plant growth and multiplication.

Treatment
cow dung treatment (T4)e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
nematode management, plant growth and multiplicatione0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cow dung treatment (T4) and goat dung treatment was observed best for nematode management, plant growth and multiplication.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–771 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat dung treatment performed best for nematode management, plant growth and multiplication.

Treatment
goat dung treatmente0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
nematode management, plant growth and multiplicatione0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cow dung treatment (T4) and goat dung treatment was observed best for nematode management, plant growth and multiplication.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–771 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treated check T8 had the greatest nematode multiplication reduction relative to inoculated check, 85.09%.

Treatment
treated check T8e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
multiplication reductione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
85.09e0
Comparator
inoculated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The multiplication reduction % over the inoculated check was maximum in treated check T8, (85.09)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 reduced nematode multiplication by 69.88% relative to the inoculated check.

Treatment
T1e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
multiplication reductione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
69.88e0
Comparator
inoculated checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by T1(69.88) T4(69.13) T2(68.82) T3, (68.37) and T5(52.71) treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“The multiplication reduction % over the inoculated check was maximum in treated check T8, (85.09)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 reduced nematode multiplication by 69.13% relative to the inoculated check.

Treatment
T4e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
multiplication reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
69.13e0
Comparator
inoculated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The multiplication reduction % over the inoculated check was maximum in treated check T8, (85.09) followed by T1(69.88) T4(69.13) T2(68.82) T3, (68.37) and T5(52.71) treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 reduced nematode multiplication by 68.82% relative to the inoculated check.

Treatment
T2e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
multiplication reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
68.82e0
Comparator
inoculated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The multiplication reduction % over the inoculated check was maximum in treated check T8, (85.09) followed by T1(69.88) T4(69.13) T2(68.82) T3, (68.37) and T5(52.71) treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 reduced nematode multiplication by 68.37% relative to the inoculated check.

Treatment
T3e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
multiplication reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
68.37e0
Comparator
inoculated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The multiplication reduction % over the inoculated check was maximum in treated check T8, (85.09) followed by T1(69.88) T4(69.13) T2(68.82) T3, (68.37) and T5(52.71) treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 reduced nematode multiplication by 52.71% relative to the inoculated check.

Treatment
T5e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
multiplication reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
52.71e0
Comparator
inoculated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The multiplication reduction % over the inoculated check was maximum in treated check T8, (85.09) followed by T1(69.88) T4(69.13) T2(68.82) T3, (68.37) and T5(52.71) treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–128 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma viride · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

pathogen product · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.