Paper · 2012 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Response of capsicum to different plant density under polyhouse and open conditions

Sanchita Brahma; D. B. Phookan; Manisha Kachari; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted using five treatments, viz., T1= 30 cm × 30 cm, T2= 40 cm × 30 cm, T3 = 45 cm × 30 cm, T4 = 40 cm × 40 cm and T5 = 45 cm × 45 cm in randomized block design with four replications under polyhouse and open conditions. One-month-old seedlings of California Wonder were transplanted at the above spacings. Treatment comprising spacing of 45 cm × 30 cm was significantly superior than other treatments with regard to plant height, number of branches, plant spread and leaf area under polyhouse and open conditions respectively. There was significantly higher yield gain under low cost naturally ventilated polyhouse as compared to open conditions

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

45 cm × 30 cm spacing produced superior height, branches and spread.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicumt0
Treatment
45 cm × 30 cme0
Outcome
plant height, number of branches, plant spreade0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment comprising spacing of 45 cm × 30 cm was significantly superior than other treatments with regard to plant height, number of branches, plant spread and leaf area under polyhouse and open conditions respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

45 cm × 30 cm spacing produced superior leaf area.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicumt0
Treatment
45 cm × 30 cme0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment comprising spacing of 45 cm × 30 cm was significantly superior than other treatments with regard to plant height, number of branches, plant spread and leaf area under polyhouse and open conditions respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low cost polyhouse produced significantly higher yield than open conditions.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicumt0
Treatment
low cost naturally ventilated polyhousee0
Outcome
yield gaine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
open conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was significantly higher yield gain under low cost naturally ventilated polyhouse as compared to open conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑

protected cultivation · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.