Paper · 2008 · Journal of research

Improving water use efficiency in wheat through plot size and irrigation schedule

C B Singh; N. K. Sekhon; K. S. Sandhu; et al.

8
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

On farm trials through participatory mode were conducted during 2003–06 at the farmer's fields in two villages of central districts of Punjab where water table situation is critical. The experimental soils varied from sandy clay loam to loamy sand in texture. Six to fifteen sites of one acre each were selected in each village. Each acre was divided into two parts to compare traditional practice and improved technology (3–5 irrigations applied in 250 m2 plots). The recommended variety and practices for wheat cultivation were followed. Results revealed that 250 m2 plots saved 3.1, 3.6 and 6.0 cm irrigation water over 500 m2 plots during 2003–04, 04–05 and 05–06 cropping seasons, respectively. Besides yield was higher in smaller plots when same number of irrigations were applied. Larger plots (500 or 1000 m2) combined with more number of irrigations recorded same yield as that obtained in smaller plots with lesser number of irrigations. Irrigation water input was more in larger plots as evident from higher (5.8 cm/180 cm profile) soil moisture storage. Distribution of soil moisture along the length was uniform in smaller plots as compared with bigger plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

250 m2 plots saved 3.1 cm irrigation water over 500 m2 plots in 2003–04

Treatment
250 m2 plotse1
Outcome
irrigation watere1
Direction
savede1
Value
3.1e1
Qualifier
2003–04e1
Comparator
500 m2 plotse1
Setting
farmer's fields in two villages of central districts of Punjabe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“water use efficiency in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“conducted during 2003–06 at the farmer's fields in two villages of central districts of Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–141 · show in text ↑
e1

“250 m2 plots saved 3.1, 3.6 and 6.0 cm irrigation water over 500 m2 plots during 2003–04, 04–05 and 05–06 cropping seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

250 m2 plots saved 3.6 cm irrigation water over 500 m2 plots in 2004–05

Treatment
250 m2 plotse1
Outcome
irrigation watere1
Direction
savede1
Value
3.6e1
Qualifier
04–05e1
Comparator
500 m2 plotse1
Setting
farmer's fields in two villages of central districts of Punjabe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“water use efficiency in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“conducted during 2003–06 at the farmer's fields in two villages of central districts of Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–141 · show in text ↑
e1

“250 m2 plots saved 3.1, 3.6 and 6.0 cm irrigation water over 500 m2 plots during 2003–04, 04–05 and 05–06 cropping seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

250 m2 plots saved 6.0 cm irrigation water over 500 m2 plots in 2005–06

Treatment
250 m2 plotse1
Outcome
irrigation watere1
Direction
savede1
Value
6.0e1
Qualifier
05–06e1
Comparator
500 m2 plotse1
Setting
farmer's fields in two villages of central districts of Punjabe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“water use efficiency in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“conducted during 2003–06 at the farmer's fields in two villages of central districts of Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–141 · show in text ↑
e1

“250 m2 plots saved 3.1, 3.6 and 6.0 cm irrigation water over 500 m2 plots during 2003–04, 04–05 and 05–06 cropping seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was higher in smaller plots when the same number of irrigations was applied

Treatment
smaller plotse2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
same number of irrigationse2
Setting
farmer's fields in two villages of central districts of Punjabe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“water use efficiency in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“conducted during 2003–06 at the farmer's fields in two villages of central districts of Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–141 · show in text ↑
e2

“Besides yield was higher in smaller plots when same number of irrigations were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larger plots with more irrigations gave the same yield as smaller plots with fewer irrigations

Treatment
more number of irrigationse3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
same yielde3
Comparator
smaller plots with lesser number of irrigationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“water use efficiency in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“conducted during 2003–06 at the farmer's fields in two villages of central districts of Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–141 · show in text ↑
e3

“Larger plots (500 or 1000 m2) combined with more number of irrigations recorded same yield as that obtained in smaller plots with lesser number of irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–946 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture storage was higher in larger plots (5.8 cm/180 cm profile)

Treatment
larger plotse4
Outcome
soil moisture storagee4
Direction
highere4
Value
5.8 cm/180 cm profilee4
Setting
farmer's fields in two villages of central districts of Punjabe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“water use efficiency in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“conducted during 2003–06 at the farmer's fields in two villages of central districts of Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–141 · show in text ↑
e4

“Irrigation water input was more in larger plots as evident from higher (5.8 cm/180 cm profile) soil moisture storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1064 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water input was greater in larger plots

Treatment
larger plotse4
Outcome
Irrigation water inpute4
Direction
moree4
Setting
farmer's fields in two villages of central districts of Punjabe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“water use efficiency in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“conducted during 2003–06 at the farmer's fields in two villages of central districts of Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–141 · show in text ↑
e4

“Irrigation water input was more in larger plots as evident from higher (5.8 cm/180 cm profile) soil moisture storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1064 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture distribution along the plot length was uniform in smaller plots and less uniform in bigger plots

Treatment
smaller plotse5
Outcome
Distribution of soil moisture along the lengthe5
Qualifier
uniforme5
Comparator
bigger plotse5
Setting
farmer's fields in two villages of central districts of Punjabe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“water use efficiency in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“conducted during 2003–06 at the farmer's fields in two villages of central districts of Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–141 · show in text ↑
e5

“Distribution of soil moisture along the length was uniform in smaller plots as compared with bigger plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1171 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.