Paper · 2017 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Moderate Drought Stress Affected Root Growth and Grain Yield in Old, Modern and Newly Released Cultivars of Winter Wheat

Yan Fang; Yanlei Du; Jun Wang; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
257
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

L) under moderate drought stress, a nursery experiment and a field trial were conducted with or without water stress using three representative cultivars released in different years: CW134 (old landrace), CH58 (modern cultivar) and CH1 (new release). In the nursery experiment, plants were grown in soil-filled rhizoboxes under moderate drought (MD, 55% of field capacity) or well-watered (WW, 85% of field capacity) conditions. In the field trial, plots were either rainfed (moderate drought stress) or irrigated with 30 mm of water at each of stem elongation, booting and anthesis stages (irrigated). Compared to drought stress, grain yields increased under sufficient water supply in all cultivars, particular the newly released cultivar CH1 with 70% increase in the nursery and 23% in the field. When well-watered (nursery) or irrigated (field), CH1 had the highest grain yields compared to the other two cultivars, but produced similar yield to the modern cultivar (CH58) under water-stressed (nursery) or rainfed (field) conditions. When exposed to drought stress, CW134 had the highest topsoil root dry mass in topsoil but lowest in subsoil among the cultivars at stem elongation, anthesis, and maturity, respectively; while CH1 had the lowest topsoil and highest subsoil root dry mass at respective sampling times. Topsoil root mass and root length density were negatively correlated with grain yield for the two water treatments in nursery experiment. When water was limited, subsoil root mass was positively correlated with thousand kernel weight (TKW). In the field trial, CH1 and CH58 used less water during vegetative growth than CW134, but after anthesis stage, CH1 used more water than the other two cultivars, especially in the soil profile below 100 cm, which was associated with the increased TKW. This study demonstrated that greater root mass and root length density in subsoil layers, with enhanced access to subsoil water after anthesis, contribute to high grain yield when soil water is scarce.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was higher under sufficient water supply than under drought stress in all cultivars

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
all cultivarse0
Treatment
sufficient water supplye0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
drought stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to drought stress, grain yields increased under sufficient water supply in all cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar CH1 showed a 70% grain yield increase under sufficient water relative to drought in the nursery

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
CH1e0
Treatment
sufficient water supplye0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
70%e0
Comparator
drought stresse0
Setting
the nurserye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to drought stress, grain yields increased under sufficient water supply in all cultivars, particular the newly released cultivar CH1 with 70% increase in the nursery and 23% in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar CH1 showed a 23% grain yield increase under sufficient water relative to drought in the field

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
CH1e0
Treatment
sufficient water supplye0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
23%e0
Comparator
drought stresse0
Setting
in the fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to drought stress, grain yields increased under sufficient water supply in all cultivars, particular the newly released cultivar CH1 with 70% increase in the nursery and 23% in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under well-watered or irrigated conditions CH1 had the highest grain yields compared with the other two cultivars

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
CH1e0
Treatment
well-watered (nursery) or irrigated (field)e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
the other two cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When well-watered (nursery) or irrigated (field), CH1 had the highest grain yields compared to the other two cultivars, but produced similar yield to the modern cultivar (CH58) under water-stressed (nursery) or rainfed (field) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water-stressed or rainfed conditions CH1 produced similar yield to the modern cultivar CH58

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
CH1e0
Treatment
water-stressed (nursery) or rainfed (field) conditionse0
Outcome
similar yielde0
Comparator
the modern cultivar (CH58)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When well-watered (nursery) or irrigated (field), CH1 had the highest grain yields compared to the other two cultivars, but produced similar yield to the modern cultivar (CH58) under water-stressed (nursery) or rainfed (field) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress CW134 had the highest topsoil root dry mass among the cultivars

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
CW134e0
Organ / stage
topsoile0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
topsoil root dry masse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
at stem elongation, anthesis, and maturity, respectivelye0
Comparator
among the cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When exposed to drought stress, CW134 had the highest topsoil root dry mass in topsoil but lowest in subsoil among the cultivars at stem elongation, anthesis, and maturity, respectively; while CH1 had the lowest topsoil and highest subsoil root dry mass at respective sampling times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress CW134 had the lowest subsoil root dry mass among the cultivars

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
CW134e0
Organ / stage
subsoile0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
root dry masse0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
among the cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When exposed to drought stress, CW134 had the highest topsoil root dry mass in topsoil but lowest in subsoil among the cultivars at stem elongation, anthesis, and maturity, respectively; while CH1 had the lowest topsoil and highest subsoil root dry mass at respective sampling times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress CH1 had the lowest topsoil root dry mass

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
CH1e0
Organ / stage
topsoile0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
root dry masse0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When exposed to drought stress, CW134 had the highest topsoil root dry mass in topsoil but lowest in subsoil among the cultivars at stem elongation, anthesis, and maturity, respectively; while CH1 had the lowest topsoil and highest subsoil root dry mass at respective sampling times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress CH1 had the highest subsoil root dry mass

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
CH1e0
Organ / stage
subsoile0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
root dry masse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When exposed to drought stress, CW134 had the highest topsoil root dry mass in topsoil but lowest in subsoil among the cultivars at stem elongation, anthesis, and maturity, respectively; while CH1 had the lowest topsoil and highest subsoil root dry mass at respective sampling times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–120 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topsoil root mass and root length density were negatively correlated with grain yield under both water treatments in the nursery experiment

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
two water treatmentse0
Outcome
Topsoil root mass and root length densitye0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Setting
nursery experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Topsoil root mass and root length density were negatively correlated with grain yield for the two water treatments in nursery experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1459 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–120 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When water was limited, subsoil root mass was positively correlated with thousand kernel weight

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
subsoile0
Treatment
water was limitede0
Outcome
thousand kernel weight (TKW)e0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When water was limited, subsoil root mass was positively correlated with thousand kernel weight (TKW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1562 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the field trial CH1 and CH58 used less water than CW134 during vegetative growth

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
CH1 and CH58e0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
during vegetative growthe0
Comparator
CW134e0
Setting
In the field triale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the field trial, CH1 and CH58 used less water during vegetative growth than CW134, but after anthesis stage, CH1 used more water than the other two cultivars, especially in the soil profile below 100 cm, which was associated with the increased TKW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the field trial CH1 used more water than the other two cultivars after anthesis, especially in the soil profile below 100 cm

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
CH1e0
Organ / stage
soil profile below 100 cme0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
after anthesis stagee0
Comparator
the other two cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the field trial, CH1 and CH58 used less water during vegetative growth than CW134, but after anthesis stage, CH1 used more water than the other two cultivars, especially in the soil profile below 100 cm, which was associated with the increased TKW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–120 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The additional water use of CH1 was associated with an increased thousand kernel weight

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
CH1e0
Outcome
TKWe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the field trial, CH1 and CH58 used less water during vegetative growth than CW134, but after anthesis stage, CH1 used more water than the other two cultivars, especially in the soil profile below 100 cm, which was associated with the increased TKW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–120 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater root mass and root length density in subsoil layers, with enhanced subsoil water access after anthesis, may contribute to high grain yield when soil water is scarce

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
subsoil layerse0
Outcome
high grain yielde0
Qualifier
when soil water is scarcee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study demonstrated that greater root mass and root length density in subsoil layers, with enhanced access to subsoil water after anthesis, contribute to high grain yield when soil water is scarce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–2016 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–120 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.