Paper · 2006 · Crop improvement

Combining Ability Analysis for Yield and Yield Contributing Characters in Spring Wheat Under Late Sown environment

Shourabh Joshi; Shailendra Sharma

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Combining ability analysis was under taken in a 10 x 10 half parental diallel progenies (F1 and F2) for grain yield and its component characters under late sown conditions. The gca and sca components of variance were significant for all the traits. However, the gca component of variance was predominant, indicating the predominance of additive gene effects for the traits studied. Among the ten parents HD 2285, HD 2329, Raj 1972 and HD 2428 were the best general combiners for grain yield and average to high combiners for other important traits. The best specific crosses for grain yield under heat stress environment were Sonalika x HD 2285, Raj 3077 x HD 2428, Sonalika x WH 157 and CPAN 3004 x HD 2329. The parents HD 2285 and Raj 1972 were the best general combiners for grain yield and protein content, whereas Raj 3077, Lok-1 and CPAN 3004 were the best general combiners for protein content. The most suitable specific crosses for protein content were HD 2329 x HD 2285, HD 2428 x Raj 1972 and CPAN 3004 x WH 157. Most of the specific crosses for grain yield as well as protein content involved high x average and average x average general combiners. To ensure further increase in grain yield along with high protein, combinations of desirable yield components is advocated. The exploitation of additive and non-additive gene actions through bi-parental mating and/or diallel selective mating systems are suggested for tangible advancement of grain yield coupled with high protein under heat stress environment in spring wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GCA and SCA variance components were significant for all traits.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
gca and sca components of variancee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“The gca and sca components of variance were significant for all the traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–247 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GCA variance component predominated, indicating additive gene effects.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
predominance of additive gene effectse0
Qualifier
gca component of variance was predominante0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“the gca component of variance was predominant, indicating the predominance of additive gene effects for the traits studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–380 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four parents were best general combiners for grain yield and average to high for other traits.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
HD 2285, HD 2329, Raj 1972 and HD 2428e0
Outcome
best general combiners for grain yield and average to high combiners for other important traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“HD 2285, HD 2329, Raj 1972 and HD 2428 were the best general combiners for grain yield and average to high combiners for other important traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–547 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four specific crosses were best for grain yield under heat stress.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Sonalika x HD 2285, Raj 3077 x HD 2428, Sonalika x WH 157 and CPAN 3004 x HD 2329e0
Outcome
best specific crosses for grain yielde0
Qualifier
heat stress environmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“The best specific crosses for grain yield under heat stress environment were Sonalika x HD 2285, Raj 3077 x HD 2428, Sonalika x WH 157 and CPAN 3004 x HD 2329”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–707 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD 2285 and Raj 1972 were best general combiners for yield and protein content.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
HD 2285 and Raj 1972e0
Outcome
best general combiners for grain yield and protein contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“HD 2285 and Raj 1972 were the best general combiners for grain yield and protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–809 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raj 3077, Lok-1 and CPAN 3004 were best general combiners for protein content.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Raj 3077, Lok-1 and CPAN 3004e0
Outcome
best general combiners for protein contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Raj 3077, Lok-1 and CPAN 3004 were the best general combiners for protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–900 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three specific crosses were most suitable for protein content.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
HD 2329 x HD 2285, HD 2428 x Raj 1972 and CPAN 3004 x WH 157e0
Outcome
most suitable specific crosses for protein contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“The most suitable specific crosses for protein content were HD 2329 x HD 2285, HD 2428 x Raj 1972 and CPAN 3004 x WH 157”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1022 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most specific crosses for yield and protein involved high by average or average by average general combiners.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
high x average and average x average general combinerse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Most of the specific crosses for grain yield as well as protein content involved high x average and average x average general combiners”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1159 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advocate combining desirable yield components to increase yield with high protein.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
combinations of desirable yield componentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“To ensure further increase in grain yield along with high protein, combinations of desirable yield components is advocated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1283 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest bi-parental or diallel selective mating to exploit additive and non-additive gene action.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
bi-parental mating and/or diallel selective mating systemse0
Qualifier
under heat stress environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“The exploitation of additive and non-additive gene actions through bi-parental mating and/or diallel selective mating systems are suggested for tangible advancement of grain yield coupled with high protein under heat stress environment in spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1536 · show in text ↑