Paper · 2016 · Microbes and Environments

Sulfur Fertilization Changes the Community Structure of Rice Root-, and Soil- Associated Bacteria

Sachiko Masuda; Zhihua Bao; Takashi Okubo; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Under paddy field conditions, biological sulfur oxidation occurs in the oxidized surface soil layer and rhizosphere, in which oxygen leaks from the aerenchyma system of rice plants. In the present study, we examined community shifts in sulfur-oxidizing bacteria associated with the oxidized surface soil layer and rice roots under different sulfur fertilization conditions based on the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene in order to explore the existence of oligotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in the paddy rice ecosystem. Rice plants were grown in pots with no fertilization (control) or CaCO3 or CaSO4 fertilization. A principal-coordinates analysis (PCoA) showed that CaSO4 fertilization markedly affected bacterial communities associated with rice roots and soil, whereas no significant differences were observed in plant growth among the fertilizer treatments examined. In rice roots, the relative abundance of Acidobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and TM7 was significantly higher in CaSO4-fertilized pots than in control pots. Alphaproteobacteria, Bradyrhizobiaceae, and Methylocystaceae members were significantly more abundant in CaSO4-fertilized roots than in control roots. On the other hand, the abundance of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria was lower in CaSO4-fertilized soil than in control soil. These results indicate that the bacteria associated with rice roots and soil responded to the sulfur amendment, suggesting that more diverse bacteria are involved in sulfur oxidation in the rice paddy ecosystem than previously considered.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaSO4 fertilization markedly shifted rice-root and soil bacterial communities.

Treatment
CaSO4 fertilizatione0
Outcome
bacterial communities associated with rice roots and soile0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CaSO4 fertilization markedly affected bacterial communities associated with rice roots and soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth did not significantly differ among fertilizer treatments.

Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences were observed in plant growth among the fertilizer treatments examined.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria were more abundant in CaSO4-fertilized roots than controls.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
CaSO4-fertilized potse0
Outcome
relative abundance of Acidobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteriae0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control potse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In rice roots, the relative abundance of Acidobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and TM7 was significantly higher in CaSO4-fertilized pots than in control pots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TM7 abundance was higher in CaSO4-fertilized roots than controls.

Treatment
CaSO4-fertilized potse0
Outcome
TM7e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control potse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the relative abundance of Acidobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and TM7 was significantly higher in CaSO4-fertilized pots than in control pots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bradyrhizobiaceae and Methylocystaceae were more abundant in fertilized roots.

Treatment
CaSO4-fertilized rootse0
Outcome
Bradyrhizobiaceae, and Methylocystaceae memberse0
Direction
more abundante0
Comparator
control rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bradyrhizobiaceae, and Methylocystaceae members were significantly more abundant in CaSO4-fertilized roots than in control roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria were less abundant in fertilized soil.

Treatment
CaSO4-fertilized soile0
Outcome
abundance of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteriae0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the abundance of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria was lower in CaSO4-fertilized soil than in control soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 670 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

755 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.