Paper · 2012 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Controlled Release Urea Improved Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Activities of Leaf Enzymes, and Rice Yield

Yuechao Yang; Min Zhang; Y.C Li; et al.

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
178
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of a controlled release urea (CRU) on concentration of N in root zones, activities of N metabolism enzymes in leaves, and N use efficiency of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) grown on a silt loam soil in lysimeters were investigated. The entire amount (100–300 kg N ha −1 ) of the CRU was incorporated into a plug for growing the rice seedlings while the regular urea was split into three applications (the standard practice). Results indicated that the N release of CRU closely matched the N requirements of the rice, and the commingling of the CRU with the rice seeds increased N concentration within the root zone and enhanced the activities of glutamine synthetase (GS), glutamine 2‐oxoglutarate amidotransferase (GOGAT) and nitrate reductase (NR) in leaves. At the same N rate, the apparent N use efficiency of the CRU applied at 300 kg N ha −1 was 27.6 and 22.9% higher than that of conventional urea treatment in 2007 and 2008, respectively. Although the CRU at 200 kg N ha −1 supplied one‐third less N than the urea at 300 kg N ha −1 , the CRU produced 3 to 5.9% more grain than the urea. Placing the CRU with rice seeds without additional fertilizer application during the entire growing season significantly increased N availability in soils and improved rice growth and led to use of less N fertilizers for greater rice grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen release from controlled release urea closely matched rice nitrogen requirements.

Outcome
N release of CRUe0
Qualifier
N requirements of the ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the N release of CRU closely matched the N requirements of the rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Commingling controlled release urea with rice seeds increased root-zone nitrogen concentration.

Treatment
commingling of the CRU with the rice seedse0
Outcome
N concentration within the root zonee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the commingling of the CRU with the rice seeds increased N concentration within the root zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Commingling controlled release urea with rice seeds enhanced leaf glutamine synthetase, GOGAT, and nitrate reductase activities.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
commingling of the CRU with the rice seedse0
Outcome
activities of glutamine synthetase (GS), glutamine 2‐oxoglutarate amidotransferase (GOGAT) and nitrate reductase (NR)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the commingling of the CRU with the rice seeds increased N concentration within the root zone and enhanced the activities of glutamine synthetase (GS), glutamine 2‐oxoglutarate amidotransferase (GOGAT) and nitrate reductase (NR) in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the same nitrogen rate in 2007, apparent nitrogen use efficiency with CRU at 300 kg N ha −1 was 27.6% higher than with conventional urea.

Treatment
CRU applied at 300 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
apparent N use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
27.6e0
Qualifier
2007e0
Comparator
conventional urea treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the same N rate, the apparent N use efficiency of the CRU applied at 300 kg N ha −1 was 27.6 and 22.9% higher than that of conventional urea treatment in 2007 and 2008, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the same nitrogen rate in 2008, apparent nitrogen use efficiency with CRU at 300 kg N ha −1 was 22.9% higher than with conventional urea.

Treatment
CRU applied at 300 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
apparent N use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
22.9%e0
Qualifier
2008e0
Comparator
conventional urea treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the same N rate, the apparent N use efficiency of the CRU applied at 300 kg N ha −1 was 27.6 and 22.9% higher than that of conventional urea treatment in 2007 and 2008, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CRU at 200 kg N ha −1 produced 3 to 5.9% more grain than urea at 300 kg N ha −1.

Treatment
CRU at 200 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
moree0
Value
3 to 5.9%e0
Comparator
urea at 300 kg N ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the CRU at 200 kg N ha −1 supplied one‐third less N than the urea at 300 kg N ha −1 , the CRU produced 3 to 5.9% more grain than the urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Placing CRU with rice seeds significantly increased soil nitrogen availability.

Treatment
Placing the CRU with rice seedse0
Outcome
N availability in soilse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Placing the CRU with rice seeds without additional fertilizer application during the entire growing season significantly increased N availability in soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Placing CRU with rice seeds improved rice growth.

Treatment
Placing the CRU with rice seedse0
Outcome
rice growthe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Placing the CRU with rice seeds without additional fertilizer application during the entire growing season significantly increased N availability in soils and improved rice growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Placing CRU with rice seeds allowed less nitrogen fertilizer for greater rice grain yield.

Treatment
Placing the CRU with rice seedse0
Outcome
rice grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
less N fertilizerse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Placing the CRU with rice seeds without additional fertilizer application during the entire growing season significantly increased N availability in soils and improved rice growth and led to use of less N fertilizers for greater rice grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1345 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: enzyme activity · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: enzyme activity · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 28 positive, 8 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

669 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

755 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.