Claim · model-written summary
CRU maintained higher root oxidation activity and N uptake than MFP and FFP during grain filling.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- CRUe0
- Outcome
- root oxidation activity (ROA) and N uptakee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- during grain fillinge0
- Comparator
- MFP and FFPe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rice”
e0“Relative to MFP and FFP, CRU maintained higher flag leaf SPAD and photosynthetic rate, as well as higher root oxidation activity (ROA) and N uptake during grain filling.”
Title
Li Wang; Cheng Xue; Xia Pan; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2018. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00999
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect CRU increased rice yield by 10.8% over FFP.
- Intervention effect CRU increased rice yield by 5.6% over MFP.
- Intervention effect CRU had significantly higher N recovery efficiency than MFP and FFP.
- Intervention effect CRU had significantly higher N agronomic efficiency than MFP and FFP.
- Mechanism Higher CRU grain yield was mainly accounted for by increased panicle number per m2.
- Mechanism Higher CRU grain yield was mainly accounted for by increased spikelet number per m2.
- Mechanism Higher N uptake accounted for increased panicle and spikelet numbers.
- Mechanism Post-anthesis dry matter production was critical for high grain yield under CRU.
- Mechanism Post-anthesis dry matter translocation was critical for high grain yield under CRU.
- Association Post-anthesis dry matter production appeared more important than translocation.
- Intervention effect CRU maintained higher flag leaf SPAD and photosynthetic rate than MFP and FFP during grain filling.
- Intervention effect CRU increased flag leaf GS, GOGAT and NR activities.