Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Blended controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer increases rice post-anthesis nitrogen accumulation, translocation and nitrogen-use efficiency

Manman Yuan; Gang Wu; Jiabao Wang; et al.

9
claims
34
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

One-time application of blended controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer (CRN) has the potential to solve the difficulty of top-dressing fertilizer in the cultivation of rice and reduce the cost of CRN fertilizer application. However, its effects on rice dry matter and nitrogen (N) accumulation and translocation, yield and N-use efficiency (NUE) remain uncertain. Field experiments were carried out at three sites (Mingguang, Chaohu, and Guichi) in the Yangtze River Delta in China to compare the effects of the conventional split applications of urea and the blended CRN and on post-anthesis dry matter and N accumulation and translocation, yield, and NUE in rice at 0, 60, 120, 180, and 240 kg N ha -1 . The results showed that at the equal N application rates, compared under the conventional N fertilizer treatment, the blended CRN application significantly increased the rice yield by an average of 0.9-6.9%, mainly due to increase the number of spikelets per panicle. The highest yield achieved with blended CRN treatment occurred at 200 kg N ha -1 , with an NUE of 45.9%. Moreover, in comparison to the conventional N fertilizer, the blended CRN treatment increased pre-anthesis N translocation (Pre-NT) by 1.0-19.8%, and the contribution of pre-NT to grain N by 0.2-8.7%, and NUE by 3.2-28.4%. Meanwhile, the blended CRN treatment reduced labor costs by 1800 Yuan ha -1 and enhanced the economic gains by 21.5-68.8%. Therefore, one-time application of blended CRN ≤ 200 kg N ha -1 application rate improved rice yield, NUE, and economic profit compared to equivalent rates of split applied conventional N fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended CRN increased rice yield by 0.9-6.9% at equal N rates.

Treatment
blended CRN applicatione0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.9-6.9%e0
Comparator
conventional N fertilizer treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the equal N application rates, compared under the conventional N fertilizer treatment, the blended CRN application significantly increased the rice yield by an average of 0.9-6.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–912 · show in text ↑
e1

“at the equal N application rates, compared under the conventional N fertilizer treatment, the blended CRN application significantly increased the rice yield by an average of 0.9-6.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–912 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield achieved with blended CRN treatment occurred at 200 kg N ha -1 , with an NUE of 45.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended CRN increased spikelets per panicle.

Treatment
blended CRNe1
Outcome
number of spikelets per paniclee0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
conventional N fertilizere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mainly due to increase the number of spikelets per panicle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“at the equal N application rates, compared under the conventional N fertilizer treatment, the blended CRN application significantly increased the rice yield by an average of 0.9-6.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–912 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield achieved with blended CRN treatment occurred at 200 kg N ha -1 , with an NUE of 45.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1077 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended CRN reached highest yield at 200 kg N ha -1 with NUE of 45.9%.

Treatment
blended CRN treatmente0
Outcome
highest yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
200 kg N ha -1e0
Qualifier
NUE of 45.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield achieved with blended CRN treatment occurred at 200 kg N ha -1 , with an NUE of 45.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“at the equal N application rates, compared under the conventional N fertilizer treatment, the blended CRN application significantly increased the rice yield by an average of 0.9-6.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–912 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield achieved with blended CRN treatment occurred at 200 kg N ha -1 , with an NUE of 45.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended CRN increased pre-anthesis N translocation by 1.0-19.8%.

Treatment
blended CRN treatmente0
Outcome
pre-anthesis N translocation (Pre-NT)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.0-19.8%e0
Comparator
conventional N fertilizere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the blended CRN treatment increased pre-anthesis N translocation (Pre-NT) by 1.0-19.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“at the equal N application rates, compared under the conventional N fertilizer treatment, the blended CRN application significantly increased the rice yield by an average of 0.9-6.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–912 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield achieved with blended CRN treatment occurred at 200 kg N ha -1 , with an NUE of 45.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended CRN increased the pre-anthesis N translocation contribution to grain N by 0.2-8.7%.

Treatment
blended CRN treatmente2
Outcome
contribution of pre-NT to grain Ne0
Direction
increasee1
Value
0.2-8.7%e0
Comparator
conventional N fertilizere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the contribution of pre-NT to grain N by 0.2-8.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“at the equal N application rates, compared under the conventional N fertilizer treatment, the blended CRN application significantly increased the rice yield by an average of 0.9-6.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–912 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield achieved with blended CRN treatment occurred at 200 kg N ha -1 , with an NUE of 45.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended CRN increased NUE by 3.2-28.4%.

Treatment
blended CRN treatmente2
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasee1
Value
3.2-28.4%e0
Comparator
conventional N fertilizere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and NUE by 3.2-28.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“at the equal N application rates, compared under the conventional N fertilizer treatment, the blended CRN application significantly increased the rice yield by an average of 0.9-6.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–912 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield achieved with blended CRN treatment occurred at 200 kg N ha -1 , with an NUE of 45.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended CRN reduced labor costs by 1800 Yuan ha -1.

Treatment
blended CRN treatmente0
Outcome
labor costse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1800 Yuan ha -1e0
Comparator
conventional N fertilizere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the blended CRN treatment reduced labor costs by 1800 Yuan ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“at the equal N application rates, compared under the conventional N fertilizer treatment, the blended CRN application significantly increased the rice yield by an average of 0.9-6.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–912 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield achieved with blended CRN treatment occurred at 200 kg N ha -1 , with an NUE of 45.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended CRN increased economic gains by 21.5-68.8%.

Treatment
blended CRN treatmente2
Outcome
economic gainse0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
21.5-68.8%e0
Comparator
conventional N fertilizere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced the economic gains by 21.5-68.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“at the equal N application rates, compared under the conventional N fertilizer treatment, the blended CRN application significantly increased the rice yield by an average of 0.9-6.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–912 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield achieved with blended CRN treatment occurred at 200 kg N ha -1 , with an NUE of 45.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1077 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend one-time blended CRN at no more than 200 kg N ha -1 for rice yield, NUE, and profit.

Outcome
one-time application of blended CRN ≤ 200 kg N ha -1 application ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one-time application of blended CRN ≤ 200 kg N ha -1 application rate improved rice yield, NUE, and economic profit compared to equivalent rates of split applied conventional N fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1624 · show in text ↑
e1

“at the equal N application rates, compared under the conventional N fertilizer treatment, the blended CRN application significantly increased the rice yield by an average of 0.9-6.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–912 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield achieved with blended CRN treatment occurred at 200 kg N ha -1 , with an NUE of 45.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1077 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.