Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Blended CRN increased spikelets per panicle.

A claim from Blended controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer increases rice post-anthesis nitrogen accumulation, translocation and nitrogen-use efficiency · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended CRN increased spikelets per panicle.

Treatment
blended CRNe1
Outcome
number of spikelets per paniclee0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
conventional N fertilizere1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mainly due to increase the number of spikelets per panicle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–972
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61
e1

“at the equal N application rates, compared under the conventional N fertilizer treatment, the blended CRN application significantly increased the rice yield by an average of 0.9-6.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–912
e2

“The highest yield achieved with blended CRN treatment occurred at 200 kg N ha -1 , with an NUE of 45.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1077

Title

Blended controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer increases rice post-anthesis nitrogen accumulation, translocation and nitrogen-use efficiency

Manman Yuan; Gang Wu; Jiabao Wang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1354384

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e5b388ef9c9779090ee8b60a9f137bd78054581fd8ec5450b1fb30e37b9f3547 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this claim · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

3,446 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.