Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Blended CRN increased rice yield by 0.9-8.2% compared with conventional fertilizer at equal nitrogen rates.

A claim from The optimum economic nitrogen rate of blended controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer for rice in the Chanoyu watershed in the Yangtze River Delta, China · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended CRN increased rice yield by 0.9-8.2% compared with conventional fertilizer at equal nitrogen rates.

Treatment
blended CRN treatmentse0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.9-8.2%e0
Qualifier
same N application ratee0
Comparator
conventional N fertilizer treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The blended CRN treatments increased rice yield by 0.9-8.2% and NUE by 6.9-14.8%, respectively, compared with the conventional N fertilizer treatments at the same N application rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1254

Title

The optimum economic nitrogen rate of blended controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer for rice in the Chanoyu watershed in the Yangtze River Delta, China

Manman Yuan; Yixiang Sun; Gang Wu; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2023. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1144461

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-30a0c78edeff463ed944876c5dc5f6b36e73fba3dca036abd36879993f0e983e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this claim · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

3,446 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.