Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Modeled five-year average rice NUE at maximum yield under blended CRN was 42.0%, 28.9% higher than conventional fertilizer.

A claim from The optimum economic nitrogen rate of blended controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer for rice in the Chanoyu watershed in the Yangtze River Delta, China · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Modeled five-year average rice NUE at maximum yield under blended CRN was 42.0%, 28.9% higher than conventional fertilizer.

Treatment
blended CRN treatmente0
Outcome
five-year average NUEe0
Direction
highere0
Value
42.0%e0
Qualifier
28.9% highere0
Comparator
conventional N fertilizer treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the quadratic equation, the five-year average NUE under the blended CRN treatment was 42.0% when rice yield reached the maximum, which was 28.9% higher than that under the conventional N fertilizer treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1579

Title

The optimum economic nitrogen rate of blended controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer for rice in the Chanoyu watershed in the Yangtze River Delta, China

Manman Yuan; Yixiang Sun; Gang Wu; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2023. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1144461

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-bbbc60629ea59f7480ac736ab7eb16c1b5b9d206f250595a78349854487df486 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

211 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.