Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Judicious Fertilizer N Split for Higher Use Efficiency in Transplanted Rice

A. Angayarkanni; M. Ravichandran

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted, to find out the best nitrogen split with urea for transplanted rice variety IR 20. Four different N splits were tried with a single level i.e. 150 kg N ha−1. The results revealed that time and the quantity of N applied influenced the N use efficiency in rice. The farmers practice of applying half of the recommended level of N as basal dose, 25 per cent 20 days after transplanting (DAT) and 25 per cent 40 days after transplanting recorded the least agronomic efficiency and response ratio. Applying 16.66 per cent of the recommended N level as basal followed by 33.3 per cent N 10 DAT, 25 per cent N 20 DAT and 25 per cent 40 DAT was found to be significantly superior than all the other treatments tried and recorded higher grain yields and N use efficiency. The rice crop requires lower N at the early stages, more N during its grand growth period and a comparatively lower N during the later stages of crop growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 16.66% of the recommended N as basal followed by 33.3% at 10 DAT, 25% at 20 DAT and 25% at 40 DAT gave higher grain yield and N use efficiency than all other splits.

Material
IR 20e0
Treatment
Applying 16.66 per cent of the recommended N level as basal followed by 33.3 per cent N 10 DAT, 25 per cent N 20 DAT and 25 per cent 40 DATe1
Outcome
grain yields and N use efficiencye1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
all the other treatments triede1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted, to find out the best nitrogen split with urea for transplanted rice variety IR 20”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applying 16.66 per cent of the recommended N level as basal followed by 33.3 per cent N 10 DAT, 25 per cent N 20 DAT and 25 per cent 40 DAT was found to be significantly superior than all the other treatments tried and recorded higher grain yields and N use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The farmers practice of applying half of the recommended N as basal dose recorded the least agronomic efficiency and response ratio.

Treatment
The farmers practice of applying half of the recommended level of N as basal dosee2
Outcome
agronomic efficiency and response ratioe2
Direction
leaste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted, to find out the best nitrogen split with urea for transplanted rice variety IR 20”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“The farmers practice of applying half of the recommended level of N as basal dose, 25 per cent 20 days after transplanting (DAT) and 25 per cent 40 days after transplanting recorded the least agronomic efficiency and response ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–525 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Time and quantity of N applied influenced N use efficiency in rice.

Treatment
time and the quantity of N appliede3
Outcome
N use efficiencye3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted, to find out the best nitrogen split with urea for transplanted rice variety IR 20”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e3

“The results revealed that time and the quantity of N applied influenced the N use efficiency in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–292 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 202 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.