Claim · model-written summary
CRFs had no effect on crop yield.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1 - Treatment
- CRFse0
- Outcome
- crop yieldse0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“However, CRFs had no effect on crop yields.”
e1“rice ( Oryza sativa L.), corn ( Zea mays L.), and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”
Title
Resham Thapa; Amitava Chatterjee; Rakesh Awale; et al. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2016. doi:10.2136/sssaj2016.06.0179
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect NIs reduced N2O emissions by 38% versus conventional fertilizer.
- Intervention effect DIs reduced N2O emissions by 30% versus conventional fertilizer.
- Intervention effect CRFs reduced N2O emissions by 19% versus conventional fertilizer.
- Intervention effect NIs increased overall crop yield by 7%.
- Intervention effect DIs reduced N2O emissions more effectively than NIs in alkaline soils.
- Intervention effect NIs were more effective than DIs in acidic soils.
- Intervention effect Urease inhibitors reduced emissions in coarse textured soils and irrigated systems.
- Intervention effect DIs increased crop yield in alkaline soils, coarse textured soils and irrigated systems.
- Recommendation The authors recommend choosing EEFs based on soil and management conditions.