Intervention effectmodel-written summary

After panicle initiation there was no residual effect of previous nitrogen source on the rate of crop nitrogen accumulation.

A claim from Long-term Comparison of the Agronomic Efficiency and Residual Benefits of Organic and Inorganic Nitrogen Sources for Tropical Lowland Rice · 1996

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After panicle initiation there was no residual effect of previous nitrogen source on the rate of crop nitrogen accumulation.

Treatment
previous nitrogen sourcee0
Outcome
rate of crop nitrogen accumulatione0
Direction
no residual effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lowland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–138
e0

“After panicle initiation there was no residual effect on the rate of crop nitrogen accumulation, and final grain yields were similar regardless of previous nitrogen source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1219

Title

Long-term Comparison of the Agronomic Efficiency and Residual Benefits of Organic and Inorganic Nitrogen Sources for Tropical Lowland Rice

K. G. Cassman; S. K. de Datta; S. T. Amarante; et al. Experimental Agriculture 1996. doi:10.1017/s0014479700001514

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-896becd136ec14964ce6d6b13e6c43ca540c47cc3150c87a96ba7ebe01a11f3f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this claim · 409 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

455 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.