Paper · 2019 · ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)

Ecological and Genetic Status of the Purple Pitcher Plant, Sarracenia purpurea L., in Maryland and Virginia

Sheridan, Philip M.

19
claims
41
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Sarracenia purpurea is a rare wetland plant in Virginia and a threatened species in Maryland, with two potential subspecies in the region. I utilized restriction fragments from the intron of the chalcone synthase gene to compare S. purpurea populations and determine whether the subspecies concept was supported. I performed a census of existing populations, compiled all known historical data on the species, and investigated the reasons for the species demise and predicted dates of extinction. Bloom phenology was examined to see if climate change may have influenced bloom period. Soil, vegetation, and climatic information was obtained to determine if taxonomic differences correlated with environmental variables. I found no genetic difference in the intron of the chalcone synthase gene in mid-Atlantic S. purpurea populations while I did find differences with other Sarracenia species and S. purpurea varieties. These results suggest that a single taxon of S. purpurea occurs in Maryland and Virginia. Only 31% (4 of 13) of the sites are extant on the western shore of Maryland and District of Columbia while 33% (14 of 42) of the sites remain in Virginia with respective populations of 46 and 513 clumps. Causes of regional extirpation include beaver flooding, succession, and development. Predicted pitcher plant population extinction dates, based on trend line from 130 years of data, are 2015 (Maryland) and 2055 (Virginia). Disturbance, especially natural fire, played an essential role in maintaining purple pitcher plant historically in Maryland and Virginia. Sarracenia purpurea blooms May 8–June 12 in Maryland and Virginia with a peak May 18–20. Peak bloom period of S. purpurea may have shifted as much as a week from historical dates, perhaps due to climate change. Purple pitcher plant soils in Maryland and Virginia met expected conditions of low pH (3.5–4.9) and were low in almost all macro- and micro-nutrients. Perturbed or polluted sites exhibited elevated levels of exchangeable cations magnesium, calcium, and sodium. Climatic data disclosed that southern Virginia purple pitcher plant sites are both warmer and wetter than those in Maryland. Maryland pitcher plant bogs had greater species richness than Virginia bogs but the latter had more state rare plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-Atlantic populations showed no intron difference in chalcone synthase.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Gene
chalcone synthase genee0
Outcome
genetic differencee0
Direction
no genetic differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“no genetic difference in the intron of the chalcone synthase gene in mid-Atlantic S. purpurea populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–833 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The intron differed from other Sarracenia species and varieties.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
differencese0
Comparator
other Sarracenia species and S. purpurea varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“differences with other Sarracenia species and S. purpurea varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–918 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The results support one regional taxon.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
a single taxone0
Setting
Maryland and Virginiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“a single taxon of S. purpurea occurs in Maryland and Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1008 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four of thirteen sites remain on the western shore of Maryland and District of Columbia.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
sites are extante0
Value
31% (4 of 13)e0
Setting
western shore of Maryland and District of Columbiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Only 31% (4 of 13) of the sites are extant on the western shore of Maryland and District of Columbia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourteen of forty-two Virginia sites remain.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
sites remaine0
Value
33% (14 of 42)e0
Setting
Virginiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“33% (14 of 42) of the sites remain in Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1163 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Maryland population has 46 clumps.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
populationse0
Value
46e0
Setting
Marylande1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“respective populations of 46 and 513 clumps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“a single taxon of S. purpurea occurs in Maryland and Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1008 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Virginia population has 513 clumps.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
populationse0
Value
513 clumpse0
Setting
Virginiae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“respective populations of 46 and 513 clumps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“a single taxon of S. purpurea occurs in Maryland and Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1008 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regional extirpation is attributed to beaver flooding, succession and development.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
regional extirpatione0
Qualifier
beaver flooding, succession, and developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Causes of regional extirpation include beaver flooding, succession, and development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1297 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Maryland population extinction was predicted for 2015.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
population extinction datese0
Value
2015e0
Setting
Marylande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Predicted pitcher plant population extinction dates, based on trend line from 130 years of data, are 2015 (Maryland) and 2055 (Virginia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1435 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Virginia population extinction was predicted for 2055.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
population extinction datese0
Value
2055e0
Setting
Virginiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Predicted pitcher plant population extinction dates, based on trend line from 130 years of data, are 2015 (Maryland) and 2055 (Virginia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1435 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disturbance, particularly natural fire, historically maintained the species in the region.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
maintaining purple pitcher plante0
Qualifier
Disturbance, especially natural firee0
Setting
Maryland and Virginiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Disturbance, especially natural fire, played an essential role in maintaining purple pitcher plant historically in Maryland and Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1573 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The species blooms May 8–June 12 with a May 18–20 peak.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
bloomse0
Value
May 8–June 12e0
Qualifier
peak May 18–20e0
Setting
Maryland and Virginiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sarracenia purpurea blooms May 8–June 12 in Maryland and Virginia with a peak May 18–20”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1662 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peak bloom may have shifted by as much as one week.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
Peak bloom periode0
Direction
shiftede0
Value
as much as a weeke0
Qualifier
perhaps due to climate changee0
Comparator
historical datese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Peak bloom period of S. purpurea may have shifted as much as a week from historical dates, perhaps due to climate change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1784 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pitcher plant soils had low pH of 3.5–4.9.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
soils in Maryland and Virginia met expected conditions of low pHe0
Value
3.5–4.9e0
Setting
Maryland and Virginiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Purple pitcher plant soils in Maryland and Virginia met expected conditions of low pH (3.5–4.9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1786–1881 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pitcher plant soils were low in almost all macro- and micro-nutrients.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
macro- and micro-nutrientse0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“were low in almost all macro- and micro-nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1886–1935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perturbed or polluted sites had elevated magnesium, calcium and sodium.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
exchangeable cations magnesium, calcium, and sodiume0
Direction
elevatede0
Setting
Perturbed or polluted sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Perturbed or polluted sites exhibited elevated levels of exchangeable cations magnesium, calcium, and sodium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1937–2045 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Southern Virginia sites were warmer and wetter than Maryland sites.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
warmer and wettere0
Comparator
those in Marylande0
Setting
southern Virginiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“southern Virginia purple pitcher plant sites are both warmer and wetter than those in Maryland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2076–2170 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maryland bogs had greater species richness than Virginia bogs.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
species richnesse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Virginia bogse0
Setting
Marylande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maryland pitcher plant bogs had greater species richness than Virginia bogs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2172–2247 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virginia bogs had more state rare plants than Maryland bogs.

Taxon
Sarracenia purpurea L.Sarracenia purpureat0
Outcome
state rare plantse0
Direction
moree0
Setting
Virginiae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarracenia purpurea
Sarracenia purpurea · TaxonShipguy · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sarracenia purpurea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“the latter had more state rare plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2252–2289 · show in text ↑
e1

“a single taxon of S. purpurea occurs in Maryland and Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1008 · show in text ↑