Paper · 2016 · International Journal of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology

Comparative Efficacy of Different Tactics for the Management of Okra Shoot and Fruit Borer, Earias Vittella (Fab.) under Field Condition

M.A. Rahman; M.M. Uddin; M.A. Haque; et al.

15
claims
32
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Comparative field efficacy of different control measures of okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella were evaluated in the Entomology Field Laboratory, Bangladesh Agricultural University during February to May, 2014. Field efficacy of two selected chemical insecticides (Decis 2.5EC, Agritaf 50SP), three botanicals (Neem oil, Pitraj oil and Mahogany oil), one parasitoid (Trichogramma chilonis), Light trap along with Hand picking and Trap crop (Maize) were evaluated by analyzing percent shoot and fruit infestations. BARI-1 (okra variety) was used as a test crop in the experiment. Among the tactics, the minimum shoot (4.72%) and fruit infestations (6.77%) were observed in the plots treated with Decis 2.5EC followed by Neem oil treated plots (4.83% in shoot and 7.56% in fruit). The highest reduction of percent shoot infestation (79.89%) and fruit infestation (64.97%) over untreated control plots was found in the Decis 2.5EC sprayed plots followed by Neem oil while the lowest percent reduction of shoot infestation (29.86%) and fruit infestation (29.43%) were recorded in case of Light trap + hand picking. Neem oil and Decis 2.5EC were found very effective in managing E. vittella up to 7 days after each spraying. Agritaf 50SP, Pitraj oil, Mahogany oil, T. chilonis and trap crop were also found effective over untreated control plots although were significantly lower than Decis 2.5EC and Neem oil. Therefore, application of Decis 2.5EC and Neem oil were mostly effective and Light trap + hand picking was the least effective measures in controlling E. vittella.Int J Appl Sci Biotechnol, Vol 4(1): 74-78

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decis 2.5EC plots had minimum shoot infestation of 4.72%.

Material
BARI-1e2
Treatment
Decis 2.5ECe0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
Outcome
shoote0
Direction
minimume0
Value
4.72%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the minimum shoot (4.72%) and fruit infestations (6.77%) were observed in the plots treated with Decis 2.5EC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–715 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“BARI-1 (okra variety)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decis 2.5EC plots had minimum fruit infestation of 6.77%.

Treatment
Decis 2.5ECe0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
Outcome
fruit infestationse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
6.77%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the minimum shoot (4.72%) and fruit infestations (6.77%) were observed in the plots treated with Decis 2.5EC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–715 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil plots had shoot infestation of 4.83%.

Treatment
Neem oile0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
Outcome
shoote0
Value
4.83%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neem oil treated plots (4.83% in shoot and 7.56% in fruit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–786 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil plots had fruit infestation of 7.56%.

Treatment
Neem oile0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
Outcome
fruite0
Value
7.56%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neem oil treated plots (4.83% in shoot and 7.56% in fruit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–786 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decis 2.5EC reduced shoot infestation by 79.89% versus untreated control.

Treatment
Decis 2.5ECe0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
Outcome
shoot infestatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
79.89%e0
Comparator
untreated control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest reduction of percent shoot infestation (79.89%) and fruit infestation (64.97%) over untreated control plots was found in the Decis 2.5EC sprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–950 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decis 2.5EC reduced fruit infestation by 64.97% versus untreated control.

Treatment
Decis 2.5ECe0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
Outcome
fruit infestatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
64.97%e0
Comparator
untreated control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest reduction of percent shoot infestation (79.89%) and fruit infestation (64.97%) over untreated control plots was found in the Decis 2.5EC sprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–950 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light trap plus hand picking had the lowest shoot infestation reduction of 29.86%.

Treatment
Light trap + hand pickinge0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
Outcome
shoot infestatione0
Direction
lowest percent reductione0
Value
29.86%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest percent reduction of shoot infestation (29.86%) and fruit infestation (29.43%) were recorded in case of Light trap + hand picking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1118 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light trap plus hand picking had the lowest fruit infestation reduction of 29.43%.

Treatment
Light trap + hand pickinge0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
Outcome
fruit infestatione0
Direction
lowest percent reductione0
Value
29.43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest percent reduction of shoot infestation (29.86%) and fruit infestation (29.43%) were recorded in case of Light trap + hand picking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1118 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil effectively controlled E. vittella through seven days after spraying.

Treatment
Neem oile0
Interactor
E. vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
Outcome
managing E. vittellae0
Qualifier
up to 7 days after each sprayinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neem oil and Decis 2.5EC were found very effective in managing E. vittella up to 7 days after each spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra Shoot and Fruit Borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decis 2.5EC effectively controlled E. vittella through seven days after spraying.

Treatment
Decis 2.5ECe0
Interactor
E. vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
Outcome
managing E. vittellae0
Qualifier
up to 7 days after each sprayinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neem oil and Decis 2.5EC were found very effective in managing E. vittella up to 7 days after each spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra Shoot and Fruit Borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Agritaf 50SP was effective versus untreated control but significantly less effective than Decis and Neem oil.

Treatment
Agritaf 50SPe0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
Outcome
effectivee0
Qualifier
significantly lower than Decis 2.5EC and Neem oile0
Comparator
untreated control plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agritaf 50SP, Pitraj oil, Mahogany oil, T. chilonis and trap crop were also found effective over untreated control plots although were significantly lower than Decis 2.5EC and Neem oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1413 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pitraj oil was effective versus untreated control but significantly less effective than Decis and Neem oil.

Treatment
Pitraj oile0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
Outcome
effectivee0
Qualifier
significantly lower than Decis 2.5EC and Neem oile0
Comparator
untreated control plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agritaf 50SP, Pitraj oil, Mahogany oil, T. chilonis and trap crop were also found effective over untreated control plots although were significantly lower than Decis 2.5EC and Neem oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1413 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mahogany oil was effective versus untreated control but significantly less effective than Decis and Neem oil.

Treatment
Mahogany oile0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
Outcome
effectivee0
Qualifier
significantly lower than Decis 2.5EC and Neem oile0
Comparator
untreated control plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agritaf 50SP, Pitraj oil, Mahogany oil, T. chilonis and trap crop were also found effective over untreated control plots although were significantly lower than Decis 2.5EC and Neem oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1413 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T. chilonis was effective versus untreated control but significantly less effective than Decis and Neem oil.

Treatment
T. chilonise0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
Second interactor
T. chilonisTrichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
effectivee0
Qualifier
significantly lower than Decis 2.5EC and Neem oile0
Comparator
untreated control plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · Second interactorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agritaf 50SP, Pitraj oil, Mahogany oil, T. chilonis and trap crop were also found effective over untreated control plots although were significantly lower than Decis 2.5EC and Neem oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1413 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap crop was effective versus untreated control but significantly less effective than Decis and Neem oil.

Treatment
trap crope0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae2pest
Outcome
effectivee0
Qualifier
significantly lower than Decis 2.5EC and Neem oile0
Comparator
untreated control plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agritaf 50SP, Pitraj oil, Mahogany oil, T. chilonis and trap crop were also found effective over untreated control plots although were significantly lower than Decis 2.5EC and Neem oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1413 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trap crop (Maize)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–456 · show in text ↑
e2

“okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–103 · show in text ↑

Trichogramma chilonis · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

light · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

trap barrier · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.