Paper · 2013 · Planta Medica

Variation of the Biologically Active Constituent Harpagoside in Harpagophytum procumbens and H. zeyheri

N Mncwangi; AM Viljoen; I Vermaak; et al.

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Harpagophytum procumbens and H. zeyheri (Pedaliaceae) are widely distributed in southern Africa. They are highly valued traditional medicines used in the treatment of inflammation and pain-related ailments such as rheumatoid arthritis, ulcers and boils [1]. The biological activity of the species has been ascribed to the presence of iridoid glycosides such as harpagoside, harpagide and procumbide. However, only harpagoside is currently used as a 'biomarker' to determine the quality of raw material and commercial products. Harpagophytum procumbens is regarded as more commercially valuable as it contains higher levels of the biologically active constituent, harpagoside, however H. zeyheri is being used as an adulterant to meet high market demands [2]. To explore the extent of variation, three hundred samples were collected throughout the geographical distribution of the two species and the harpagoside content quantified using LC-MS. The results confirm that both species contain harpagoside and that it is present in higher amounts in H. procumbens with a range of 0.17 – 4.37%, whereas in H. zeyheri, the range was 0.00 – 3.07%. According to the standard set by the European Pharmacopoeia, the harpagoside content is required to be at least 1.2%. All of the H. procumbens samples tested contained harpagoside, although only 61 met the 1.2% specification. Only 38 H. zeyheri samples contained harpagoside and only 26 met the specifications indicating that it is not a suitable substitute. This study confirmed that the two taxa are highly variable and intricate species as reflected by the significant variation in harpagoside content. This study provides valuable information regarding the difficulties of quality control and can also be used as a basis for the selection of raw material for propagation. Acknowledgements: The National Research Foundation of South Africa is thanked for its financial contribution to the study. References: [1] Van Wyk B-E, Gericke NP (2000) Peoples Plants. A guide to Useful Plants of Southern Africa. Briza Publications, Pretoria, South Africa. [2] Stewart KM, Cole D, (2005)J Ethnopharmacol, 100: 225 – 236.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harpagoside content in H. procumbens samples ranged from 0.17 to 4.37%.

Taxon
H. procumbensHarpagophytum procumbense0
Outcome
harpagosidee0
Value
0.17 – 4.37%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum procumbens
Harpagophytum procumbens · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both species contain harpagoside and that it is present in higher amounts in H. procumbens with a range of 0.17 – 4.37%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1088 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harpagoside content in H. zeyheri samples ranged from 0.00 to 3.07%.

Outcome
harpagosidee0
Value
0.00 – 3.07%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum zeyheri
Harpagophytum zeyheri · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both species contain harpagoside”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1001 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas in H. zeyheri, the range was 0.00 – 3.07%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harpagoside is present in higher amounts in H. procumbens than in H. zeyheri.

Taxon
H. procumbensHarpagophytum procumbense0
Outcome
harpagosidee0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum procumbens
Harpagophytum procumbens · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both species contain harpagoside and that it is present in higher amounts in H. procumbens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1059 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested H. procumbens samples contained harpagoside.

Taxon
H. procumbensHarpagophytum procumbense0
Outcome
contained harpagosidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum procumbens
Harpagophytum procumbens · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All of the H. procumbens samples tested contained harpagoside”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1320 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 61 of the H. procumbens samples met the 1.2% harpagoside specification.

Taxon
H. procumbensHarpagophytum procumbense1
Outcome
met the 1.2% specificatione0
Value
61e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum procumbens
Harpagophytum procumbens · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only 61 met the 1.2% specification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1365 · show in text ↑
e1

“All of the H. procumbens samples tested contained harpagoside”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1320 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 38 H. zeyheri samples contained harpagoside.

Outcome
samples contained harpagosidee0
Value
38e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum zeyheri
Harpagophytum zeyheri · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only 38 H. zeyheri samples contained harpagoside”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1415 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 26 H. zeyheri samples met the harpagoside specification.

Outcome
met the specificationse0
Value
26e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum zeyheri
Harpagophytum zeyheri · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only 38 H. zeyheri samples contained harpagoside and only 26 met the specifications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1450 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that H. zeyheri is not a suitable substitute for H. procumbens.

Outcome
not a suitable substitutee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum zeyheri
Harpagophytum zeyheri · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only 38 H. zeyheri samples contained harpagoside and only 26 met the specifications indicating that it is not a suitable substitute”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1498 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two Harpagophytum taxa are highly variable, with significant variation in harpagoside content.

Taxon
Harpagophytum procumbens and H. zeyheriHarpagophytum procumbensHarpagophytum zeyherit0
Outcome
variation in harpagoside contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum procumbens
Harpagophytum procumbens · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Harpagophytum zeyheri
Harpagophytum zeyheri · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the two taxa are highly variable and intricate species as reflected by the significant variation in harpagoside content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Harpagophytum procumbens and H. zeyheri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–103 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors state that the results can be used as a basis for selecting raw material for propagation.

Taxon
Harpagophytum procumbens and H. zeyheriHarpagophytum procumbensHarpagophytum zeyherit0
Outcome
selection of raw material for propagatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum procumbens
Harpagophytum procumbens · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Harpagophytum zeyheri
Harpagophytum zeyheri · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“can also be used as a basis for the selection of raw material for propagation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1738–1815 · show in text ↑
t0

“Harpagophytum procumbens and H. zeyheri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–103 · show in text ↑