Abstract
Persistence and productivity of grazing‐tolerant ‘Alfagraze’ alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) grown with endophyte‐free tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) is not well known. Our primary objectives were to determine yield and persistence of the grass and legume in mixture and monoculture with and without N fertilizer at three Georgia locations over 3 yr. Small‐plot field experiments with four replications harvested at 4‐wk intervals were conducted at Blairsville in the mountains on a Clifton clay loam (clayey, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludults) and at Eatonton in the lower Piedmont on a Davidson loam (clayey, kaolinitic, thermic, Humic Paleudult). The five treatments were ‘AU Triumph’ tall fescue with 0 N; tall fescue with 50 lb N/acre in September, February, and April; tall fescue and Alfagraze alfalfa with 0 N; tall fescue + alfalfa with 50 lb N/acre in February; and alfalfa alone, all harvested at 4‐wk intervals. At Athens in the Piedmont on Cecil sandy clay loam (clayey, thermic, kaolinitic Typic Hapludult) the same treatments were harvested at 3‐, 4‐, and 6‐wk intervals. Alfagraze alfalfa persisted well and was productive in mixture with AU Triumph tall fescue with 0 N, averaging about 8000 lb/acre dry forage at the three locations when cut at 4‐wk intervals over 3 yr. During the third year, alfalfa constituted 50% or more of the mixture by estimate at 4‐ and 6‐wk cutting invervals and greater than 25% at the 3‐wk interval with no additional N fertilizer. Alfalfa monoculture and tall fescue‐alfalfa mixtures without N fertilization had similar annual yields, which were superior to grass monoculture with 150 lb N/acre except at Athens where unfavorable soil conditions hindered alfalfa growth. Nitrogen fertilization (50 lb N/acre) of mixtures increased total yield but did not affect percentage alfalfa in the forage. Summer production of alfalfa was superior to tall fescue. Results suggest that Alfagraze alfalfa adequately fertilized with P and K can be successfully grown with endotype‐free tall fescue when harvested at 3‐ to 4‐wk intervals, suggesting good persistence under rotational stocking with livestock. Research Question Major advantages of a grass‐alfalfa mixture are reduced bloat potential, fewer weed problems, and a more uniform seasonal distribution of yield. A major problem of alfalfa in grass mixtures is stability of stand and production, especially with frequent defoliation or N fertilization. The present study evaluated persistence and productivity of grazing‐tolerant alfalfa and endophyte‐free tall fescue in mixture and monoculture with and without N fertilizer at three Georgia locations. Literature Summary Frequent cutting or grazing of hay‐type alfalfa cultivars consistently reduces stand, but the Alfagraze cultivar is tolerant of this treatment in monocultures. In mixtures with hay‐type cultivars, infrequent cutting favors alfalfa domination while more frequent defoliation favors grass. Information on persistence and productivity of Alfagraze in grass mixtures is very limited, especially when N fertilizer is applied to improve grass production in late winter. Study Description Yield and persistence of ‘AU Triumph’ tall fescue and Alfagraze alfalfa treatments (Table ) were evaluated at three locations over 3 yr. Experiments were harvested at 4‐wk intervals at Blairsville (2300 ft elevation) and Eatonton (490 ft). The same treatments were harvested at 3‐, 4‐, and 6‐wk intervals at Athens (980 ft). Harvesting was done from late March to November. How did N fertilization affect the mixtures? Application of 50 lb N/acre in February to mixtures increased total yields about 1990 lb/acre as compared with 0 N but had little consistent effect on alfalfa content of the sward and no effect on stand persistence. Recommendation Alfagraze alfalfa can be grown with endophyte‐free tall fescue if adequately fertilized and cut at 4‐ to 6‐wk intervals. The relatively good alfalfa persistence when cut at 3‐wk intervals indicates that the mixtures can be rotationally stocked with cattle using a 3‐wk rest period between grazings although alfalfa yield will be less than rotation with longer rest intervals. Applied Question Did Alfagraze alfalfa stands persist and remain productive in mixtures with AU Triumph tall fescue? Alfalfa maintained excellent stands in tall fescue when harvested at 6‐wk intervals but declined when cut at 4‐ or 3‐wk intervals (Table ). Cutting at 3‐ or 4‐wk intervals also decreased the percentage of alfalfa in the sward. When cut at 6‐wk intervals, alfalfa constituted over 90% of the mixture during the third year. In contrast, alfalfa in the mixture cut every 3 wk declined from 50% the first year to 33% the third year. Alfalfa alone or in mixture supplied a greater percentage of total production during summer than did tall fescue alone. Tall fescue‐alfalfa and alfalfa alone had yields which were superior to, or similar to, tall fescue fertilized with 150 lb N/acre. Nitrogen fertilization of tall fescue and mixtures. Species N lb/acre Alfalfa alone 0 Fescue‐alfalfa 0 Fescue‐alfalfa 50 in February Fescue alone 0 Fescue alone 50 in September, February, April Stand persistence and Alfagraze alfalfa composition of forage in mixtures with tall fescue when harvested at 3‐, 4‐, and 6‐wk intervals, third year, Athens. Alfalfa Alfalfa‐fescue + 50 lb N/acre Alfalfa‐fescue 0 N Shoots/square foot 3 wk cut 32 15 12 4 wk cut 29 20 11 6 wk cut 45 33 30 Percentage alfalfa in forage 3 wk cut 100 22 33 4 wk cut 100 55 37 6 wk cut 100 72 92
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Alfagraze alfalfa in mixture with tall fescue without N averaged about 8000 lb/acre dry forage when cut at 4-wk intervals over 3 yr.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae1 - Treatment
- mixture with AU Triumph tall fescue with 0 Ne1
- Outcome
- dry foragee1
- Value
- 8000 lb/acree1
- Qualifier
- when cut at 4‐wk intervals over 3 yre1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Alfagraze alfalfa persisted well and was productive in mixture with AU Triumph tall fescue with 0 N, averaging about 8000 lb/acre dry forage at the three locations when cut at 4‐wk intervals over 3 yr”
Claim · model-written summary
In the third year alfalfa constituted 50% or more of the mixture at 4- and 6-wk cutting intervals.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae2
- Outcome
- alfalfa constitutede2
- Value
- 50% or moree2
- Qualifier
- During the third yeare2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“During the third year, alfalfa constituted 50% or more of the mixture by estimate at 4‐ and 6‐wk cutting invervals”
Claim · model-written summary
Alfalfa constituted more than 25% of the mixture at the 3-wk interval with no additional N fertilizer.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae2
- Outcome
- alfalfa constitutede2
- Value
- greater than 25%e3
- Qualifier
- at the 3‐wk interval with no additional N fertilizere3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“During the third year, alfalfa constituted 50% or more of the mixture by estimate at 4‐ and 6‐wk cutting invervals”
e3“greater than 25% at the 3‐wk interval with no additional N fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Alfalfa monoculture and tall fescue-alfalfa mixtures without N had similar annual yields.
- Taxon
- AlfalfaMedicago sativae4
- Treatment
- Alfalfa monoculturee4
- Outcome
- annual yieldse4
- Direction
- similare4
- Comparator
- tall fescue‐alfalfa mixtures without N fertilizatione4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Alfalfa monoculture and tall fescue‐alfalfa mixtures without N fertilization had similar annual yields, which were superior to grass monoculture with 150 lb N/acre except at Athens where unfavorable soil conditions hindered alfalfa growth”
Claim · model-written summary
Alfalfa monoculture had higher annual yields than grass monoculture with 150 lb N/acre, except at Athens.
- Taxon
- AlfalfaMedicago sativae4
- Treatment
- Alfalfa monoculturee4
- Outcome
- annual yieldse4
- Direction
- superiore4
- Qualifier
- except at Athens where unfavorable soil conditions hindered alfalfa growthe4
- Comparator
- grass monoculture with 150 lb N/acree4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Alfalfa monoculture and tall fescue‐alfalfa mixtures without N fertilization had similar annual yields, which were superior to grass monoculture with 150 lb N/acre except at Athens where unfavorable soil conditions hindered alfalfa growth”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilization of alfalfa-tall fescue mixtures increased total yield.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae6
- Treatment
- Nitrogen fertilization (50 lb N/acre) of mixturese6
- Outcome
- total yielde6
- Direction
- increasede6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Nitrogen fertilization (50 lb N/acre) of mixtures increased total yield but did not affect percentage alfalfa in the forage”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilization of alfalfa-tall fescue mixtures did not affect the percentage of alfalfa in the forage.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae6
- Treatment
- Nitrogen fertilization (50 lb N/acre) of mixturese6
- Outcome
- percentage alfalfa in the foragee6
- Direction
- did not affecte6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Nitrogen fertilization (50 lb N/acre) of mixtures increased total yield but did not affect percentage alfalfa in the forage”
Claim · model-written summary
Summer production of alfalfa was superior to tall fescue.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae1
- Outcome
- Summer productione1
- Direction
- superiore1
- Comparator
- tall fescuee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Summer production of alfalfa was superior to tall fescue”
Claim · model-written summary
Adequately fertilized Alfagraze alfalfa can be successfully grown with endophyte-free tall fescue when harvested at 3- to 4-wk intervals.
Verbatim
e1“Results suggest that Alfagraze alfalfa adequately fertilized with P and K can be successfully grown with endotype‐free tall fescue when harvested at 3‐ to 4‐wk intervals”
Claim · model-written summary
Alfagraze alfalfa can be grown with endophyte-free tall fescue if adequately fertilized and cut at 4- to 6-wk intervals.
Verbatim
e1“Alfagraze alfalfa can be grown with endophyte‐free tall fescue if adequately fertilized and cut at 4‐ to 6‐wk intervals”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 50 lb N/acre in February to alfalfa-tall fescue mixtures increased total yields by about 1990 lb/acre compared with 0 N.
Verbatim
e1“Application of 50 lb N/acre in February to mixtures increased total yields about 1990 lb/acre as compared with 0 N”
t0“Alfagraze Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Alfalfa stands were excellent at 6-wk cutting intervals and declined at 4- or 3-wk intervals in tall fescue.
- Taxon
- AlfalfaMedicago sativae1
- Treatment
- cut at 4‐ or 3‐wk intervalse1
- Outcome
- standse1
- Direction
- declinede1
- Comparator
- harvested at 6‐wk intervalse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Alfalfa maintained excellent stands in tall fescue when harvested at 6‐wk intervals but declined when cut at 4‐ or 3‐wk intervals”
Claim · model-written summary
At 6-wk cutting intervals alfalfa constituted over 90% of the mixture in the third year.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae1
- Outcome
- alfalfa constitutede1
- Value
- over 90%e1
- Qualifier
- When cut at 6‐wk intervalse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“When cut at 6‐wk intervals, alfalfa constituted over 90% of the mixture during the third year”
Claim · model-written summary
Cutting at 3- or 4-wk intervals decreased the percentage of alfalfa in the sward.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae1
- Treatment
- Cutting at 3‐ or 4‐wk intervalse1
- Outcome
- percentage of alfalfa in the swarde1
- Direction
- decreasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Cutting at 3‐ or 4‐wk intervals also decreased the percentage of alfalfa in the sward”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · organism · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →nitrogen · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
41 papers more in this group
See all 45 papers →rotation · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →pruning · organism · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →fertilization · organism · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →fertilization · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
180 papers more in this group
See all 184 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.