Abstract
Abstract Long‐term irrigated alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) field experiments at two locations in Colorado [Keith clay loam (Aridic Argiustolls) and Ravola loam (Typic Torrifluvents)] were established to (i) determine the magnitude and frequency of P and K fertilization required to maintain initial soil tests, and (ii) evaluate the residual value of soil and fertilizer P and K. Ten P and K treatments (3 annual, 1 triennial, and 1 initial application) were used. Alfalfa yield, P and K uptake, NaHCO 3 ‐extractable P, and NH 4 C 2 H 3 O 2 ‐exchangeable K were measured over 6 production years. Soil test P declined in both soils to levels where significant yield responses to fertilizer P were expected, but none were observed. Organic P mineralization and/or an extensive mycorrhizal association were suggested as contributing factors to P availability. Generally, application of 50 kg P ha −1 maintained initial NaHCO 3 ‐P at both locations, while soil P declined below the initial level for all other P rates. Phosphorus uptake was significantly increased by P fertilization on the Keith soil, due to lower NaHCO 3 ‐P level, but not on the Ravola soil. Soil test K remained at high levels in both soils and no yield responses to fertilizer K were observed. Application of 380 and 5 kg K ha −1 were calculated to maintain initial NH 4 C 2 H 3 O 2 ‐K in the Keith and Ravola soils, respectively. The low maintenance requirement of the Ravola soil was due apparently to a high nonexchangeable K release rate which buffered exchangeable K near 100 mg kg −1 . Potassium uptake was significantly increased by K fertilization in the Ravola soil, due to a lower exchangeable K level, but not in the Keith soil. The results indicate very large P and K reserves exist in both soils and unless improved forage quality influences the economic benefit from P and K fertilizer application, fertilization of these soils would not be recommended.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Soil test P declined in both soils in the alfalfa experiments.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Outcome
- Soil test Pe1
- Direction
- declinede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“Soil test P declined in both soils”
Claim · model-written summary
Despite declining soil test P, no significant yield response to fertilizer P was observed in alfalfa although one was expected.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- fertilizer Pe1
- Outcome
- yield responsese1
- Direction
- none were observede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“significant yield responses to fertilizer P were expected, but none were observed”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic P mineralization and/or an extensive mycorrhizal association were suggested as contributing to P availability.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Interactor
- mycorrhizal associatione1symbiont
- Outcome
- P availabilitye1
- Qualifier
- Organic P mineralization and/or an extensive mycorrhizal associatione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“Organic P mineralization and/or an extensive mycorrhizal association were suggested as contributing factors to P availability”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 50 kg P per ha maintained the initial NaHCO3-extractable P at both locations.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- application of 50 kg P ha −1e1
- Outcome
- initial NaHCO 3e1
- Direction
- maintainede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“Generally, application of 50 kg P ha −1 maintained initial NaHCO 3”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil P declined below the initial level for all P rates other than 50 kg P per ha.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- all other P ratese1
- Outcome
- soil Pe1
- Direction
- declinede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“soil P declined below the initial level for all other P rates”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus uptake by alfalfa was significantly increased by P fertilization on the Keith soil.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- P fertilizatione1
- Outcome
- Phosphorus uptakee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Setting
- Keith soile1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“Phosphorus uptake was significantly increased by P fertilization on the Keith soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus uptake by alfalfa was not increased by P fertilization on the Ravola soil.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- P fertilizatione1
- Outcome
- Phosphorus uptakee1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede2
- Setting
- Ravola soile2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“Phosphorus uptake was significantly increased by P fertilization on the Keith soil”
e2“but not on the Ravola soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil test K remained at high levels in both soils.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Outcome
- Soil test Ke1
- Direction
- remained at high levelse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“Soil test K remained at high levels in both soils”
Claim · model-written summary
No yield responses of alfalfa to fertilizer K were observed.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- fertilizer Ke1
- Outcome
- yield responsese1
- Direction
- no yield responsese1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“no yield responses to fertilizer K were observed”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 380 kg K per ha was calculated to maintain initial exchangeable K in the Keith soil.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Outcome
- maintain initial NH 4 C 2 H 3 O 2e1
- Value
- 380e1
- Setting
- Keithe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“Application of 380 and 5 kg K ha −1 were calculated to maintain initial NH 4 C 2 H 3 O 2”
e2“in the Keith and Ravola soils, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 5 kg K per ha was calculated to maintain initial exchangeable K in the Ravola soil.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Outcome
- maintain initial NH 4 C 2 H 3 O 2e1
- Value
- 5 kg K ha −1e1
- Setting
- Ravolae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“Application of 380 and 5 kg K ha −1 were calculated to maintain initial NH 4 C 2 H 3 O 2”
e2“in the Keith and Ravola soils, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The low K maintenance requirement of the Ravola soil was apparently due to a high nonexchangeable K release rate that buffered exchangeable K near 100 mg per kg.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Compound
- nonexchangeable Ke1
- Outcome
- low maintenance requiremente1
- Setting
- Ravola soile1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“The low maintenance requirement of the Ravola soil was due apparently to a high nonexchangeable K release rate which buffered exchangeable K near 100 mg kg −1”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium uptake by alfalfa was significantly increased by K fertilization in the Ravola soil.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- K fertilizatione1
- Outcome
- Potassium uptakee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Setting
- Ravola soile1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“Potassium uptake was significantly increased by K fertilization in the Ravola soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium uptake by alfalfa was not increased by K fertilization in the Keith soil.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- K fertilizatione1
- Outcome
- Potassium uptakee1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede2
- Setting
- Keith soile2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“Potassium uptake was significantly increased by K fertilization in the Ravola soil”
e2“but not in the Keith soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Very large P and K reserves exist in both soils.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Outcome
- P and K reservese1
- Direction
- very largee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“very large P and K reserves exist in both soils”
Claim · model-written summary
Unless improved forage quality changes the economic benefit, P and K fertilization of these soils is not recommended.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Outcome
- fertilization of these soils would not be recommendede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“fertilization of these soils would not be recommended”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · molecular: metabolites · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →fertilization · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 151 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
180 papers more in this group
See all 184 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.