Paper · 1995 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Fruiting Stress Induces Shuck Decline and Premature Germination in Pecan

Darrell Sparks; William Reid; I.E. Yates; et al.

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
15
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The influence of fruiting stress on shuck decline, nut quality, and premature germinaiton was evaluated on trees of pecan [ Carya illinoensis (Wangenh.) C. Koch]. Fruit at the liquid endosperm state were removed from trees with a mechanical shaker to reduce crop load by 0%, 25%, 41%, 56%, or 77%. Shuck decline and premature germination decreased and kernel quality increased with a reduction in crop load. An excessive fruit load or fruit stress elevated the incidence of shuck decline, previously referred to as shuck disease, tulip disease, shuck die-back, or late season shuck disorder; decreased kernel development; and increased premature germinaiton. Shucks were dissected from fruit ranging from healthy to those with premature shuck opening and examined by scanning electron, transmission electron, and light microscopy. Fungal growth was detectable, but only after tissue degeneration had occurred. Thus, results indicate the onset of shuck decline is caused by stress associated with an excessive crop load and not a pathological disorder. Fungal growth is a secondary, not a primary, factor in deterioration of shucks with decline.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing crop load decreased shuck decline and premature germination in pecan.

Treatment
reduce crop load by 0%, 25%, 41%, 56%, or 77%e1
Outcome
Shuck decline and premature germinatione2
Direction
decreasede2
Comparator
0%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carya illinoinensis
Carya illinoinensis · TaxonJames St. John · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trees of pecan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit at the liquid endosperm state were removed from trees with a mechanical shaker to reduce crop load by 0%, 25%, 41%, 56%, or 77%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–296 · show in text ↑
e2

“Shuck decline and premature germination decreased and kernel quality increased with a reduction in crop load”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing crop load increased kernel quality in pecan.

Treatment
reduce crop load by 0%, 25%, 41%, 56%, or 77%e1
Outcome
kernel qualitye2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
0%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carya illinoinensis
Carya illinoinensis · TaxonJames St. John · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trees of pecan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit at the liquid endosperm state were removed from trees with a mechanical shaker to reduce crop load by 0%, 25%, 41%, 56%, or 77%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–296 · show in text ↑
e2

“Shuck decline and premature germination decreased and kernel quality increased with a reduction in crop load”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–406 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An excessive fruit load or fruit stress was associated with decreased kernel development in pecan.

Treatment
excessive fruit loade1
Outcome
kernel developmente2
Direction
decreasede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carya illinoinensis
Carya illinoinensis · TaxonJames St. John · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trees of pecan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“An excessive fruit load or fruit stress elevated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–456 · show in text ↑
e2

“decreased kernel development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–620 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal growth in pecan shucks was detectable only after tissue degeneration had occurred.

Organ / stage
tissuee1
Interactor
Fungale1other
Outcome
Fungal growth was detectablee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carya illinoinensis
Carya illinoinensis · TaxonJames St. John · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trees of pecan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fungal growth was detectable, but only after tissue degeneration had occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–908 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the onset of shuck decline is caused by stress associated with an excessive crop load and not a pathological disorder.

Treatment
excessive crop loade1
Outcome
onset of shuck declinee1
Qualifier
not a pathological disordere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carya illinoinensis
Carya illinoinensis · TaxonJames St. John · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trees of pecan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“results indicate the onset of shuck decline is caused by stress associated with an excessive crop load and not a pathological disorder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1050 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that fungal growth is a secondary, not a primary, factor in deterioration of declining pecan shucks.

Interactor
Fungale1other
Outcome
deterioration of shuckse1
Qualifier
secondary, not a primary, factore1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carya illinoinensis
Carya illinoinensis · TaxonJames St. John · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trees of pecan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fungal growth is a secondary, not a primary, factor in deterioration of shucks with decline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1143 · show in text ↑