Paper · 2016 · Computational Water Energy and Environmental Engineering

Effect of Puddling and Compaction on Water Requirements of Rice at Hamelmalo, Eritrea

Bahlbi Goitom; Ramesh Prasad Tripathi; Woldeselassie Ogbazghi; et al.

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Eritrean farmers can cultivate rice by harvesting runoff from >82% available non-agricultural land in agricultural watersheds for crop use and reducing percolation through optimization of tillage. Experiments were conducted with NERICA rice, N11, to optimize irrigation requirements and puddling and compaction to reduce percolation. Experimental field was adjacent to Anseba River at downstream end of the watershed and a pond on the upstream to intercept runoff. Irrigation treatments were runoff farming with maximum runoff application depth of 10 mm (I1), and 50 mm irrigation two (I2), five (I3), and seven (I4) days after disappearance of ponded water in main plots and puddling by one (T1), two (T2) and three (T3) passes of puddler and compaction by three (T4), four (T5) and five (T6) passes of 600 kg roller in sub plots in 3 replications. Soil profile was loam in the surface 0.45 m and coarse sandy loam below forming porous belt. Soil submergence was difficult to maintain, but water table was developed in soil profile due to inflow of seepage from the river and pond. Depth to the water table was within 1.5 ± 0.1 m for >2 months and receded down to 1.7 m by crop maturity. Soil wetness was near field capacity around 0.7 m depth and increased below due to natural sub-irrigation from the water table. Rice roots penetrated 0.8 m in the puddled plots and 0.7 m in the compacted plots. Residual soil moisture of 135 - 146 mm·m-1 after rice harvesting provides opportunity for planting rapeseed mustered following rice. Puddling was superior to compaction in loam soil. Puddling twice and irrigation 50 mm 7 days after ponded water vanished from surface was sufficient for optimum rice grain yield of 4346 kg·ha-1 and straw yield of 4458 kg·ha-1. Optimum puddling and irrigation schedules reduced crop duration by 6 days without significantly affecting yield. Production function showed that rice grain yield of 4789 kg ha-1 could be obtained by 1009 mm applied water through rainfall and irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice roots penetrated 0.8 m in puddled plots.

Treatment
puddled plotse0
Outcome
roots penetratede0
Value
0.8 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice roots penetrated 0.8 m in the puddled plots and 0.7 m in the compacted plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1398 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice roots penetrated 0.7 m in compacted plots.

Treatment
compacted plotse0
Outcome
roots penetratede0
Value
0.7 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice roots penetrated 0.8 m in the puddled plots and 0.7 m in the compacted plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1398 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual soil moisture after rice harvest was 135 - 146 mm·m-1.

Outcome
Residual soil moisturee0
Value
135 - 146 mm·m-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual soil moisture of 135 - 146 mm·m-1 after rice harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Puddling performed better than compaction in loam soil.

Treatment
Puddlinge0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
compactione0
Setting
loam soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Puddling was superior to compaction in loam soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice puddling and irrigation after seven days produced optimal rice grain yield of 4346 kg·ha-1.

Treatment
Puddling twice and irrigation 50 mm 7 days after ponded water vanished from surfacee0
Outcome
rice grain yielde0
Direction
optimume0
Value
4346 kg·ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Puddling twice and irrigation 50 mm 7 days after ponded water vanished from surface was sufficient for optimum rice grain yield of 4346 kg·ha-1 and straw yield of 4458 kg·ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1758 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same schedule produced rice straw yield of 4458 kg·ha-1.

Treatment
Puddling twice and irrigation 50 mm 7 days after ponded water vanished from surfacee0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Value
4458 kg·ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Puddling twice and irrigation 50 mm 7 days after ponded water vanished from surface was sufficient for optimum rice grain yield of 4346 kg·ha-1 and straw yield of 4458 kg·ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal puddling and irrigation shortened crop duration by six days.

Treatment
Optimum puddling and irrigation schedulese0
Outcome
crop duratione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
6 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Optimum puddling and irrigation schedules reduced crop duration by 6 days without significantly affecting yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1760–1871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The schedules did not significantly affect yield.

Treatment
Optimum puddling and irrigation schedulese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
without significantly affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Optimum puddling and irrigation schedules reduced crop duration by 6 days without significantly affecting yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1760–1871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A production function estimated rice grain yield of 4789 kg ha-1 with 1009 mm applied water.

Treatment
1009 mm applied water through rainfall and irrigatione0
Outcome
rice grain yielde0
Value
4789 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Production function showed that rice grain yield of 4789 kg ha-1 could be obtained by 1009 mm applied water through rainfall and irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–2012 · show in text ↑

tillage · phenology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

irrigation · phenology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 587 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 906 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.