Paper · 1978 · Japanese Journal of Crop Science

Studies on Tobacco Culture in the Subtropic Conditions II. The growth of tobacco as related to different planting times in the district of Okinawa

Yoshihiko AKIMOTO; Tadashi NAKAYAMA

17
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In order to determine the best planting time for tobacco culture in the district of Okinawa, tobacco (flue-cured tobacco variety, SC72) was planted at three different days (on January 10, 30 and February 20), and investigated about number of total leaves, growth process, yield and price per kg of the flue-cured caves, etc. in Miyako Is., the representative district of tobacco leaves-production area in Okinawa in 1976. The results were obtained as follows; 1. There was a tendency for number of total leaves to decrease as the planting time was advanced; 27.6, 30.8 and 33.0 leaves on tobacco planted on January 10, 30 and February 20, respectively (Table 1). 2. The growth of tobacco planted on January 10 was depressed on account of slightly low temperature and small amount of precipitation in the early stage. In the later stage, this tobacco showed vigorous growth and its prosperous growth was prolonged to the harvesting time. Tobacco planted on February 20 grew vigorously in the early stage, and its rate of dry matter production increased again owing to much amount of precipitation in the harvesting time. The growth process of tobacco planted on January 30 was comparatively moderate (Fig. 3, 4 and Table 3). 3. Width/length ratio of the harvested leaves on lower stalk position decreased as the planting time was advanced (Fig. 7). 4. The area of the harvested leaves was greater on each stalk position of tobacco planted on February 20 than that on the comparable stalk position of tobacco planted on January 10 or January 30, though there was not such a difference between tobacco planted on January 10 and that planted on January 30 (Fig. 7). 5. But, in dry leaf weight per unit leaf area of harvested leaves, tobacco planted on February 20 was not superior to tobacco planted on other day. On the contrary, the upper leaves of this tobacco were apparently inferior to those of tobacco planted on January 30 in dry leaf weight per unit leaf area. There was similar difference at the upper leaves between tobacco planted on January 10 and that planted on January 30. These results may indicate that the upper leaves harvested from tobacco planted on January 10 or February 20 seemed to be a little immature, in comparison with those harvested from tobacco planted on January 30 (Fig. 8). 6. Yield of the flue-cured leaves per 10a increased as the planting time was retarded, i.e., 269.0 kg, 282.8 kg and 363.3 kg in the plots planted on January 10, 30 and February 20, respectively. However, in the price per kg of cured leaves, the plot planted on Fcbruary 20 was inferior to other plots. The highest price per kg of cured leaves was gained in the plot planted on January 30 (Table 4). Judging from the results mentioned above, it is concluded that the last 10 day-period of January seems to be the best planting time for tobacco culture in Miyako Is. and the district near this island.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total leaf number tended to decrease as later planting dates were used, with 27.6, 30.8 and 33.0 leaves for the January 10, January 30 and February 20 plantings.

Treatment
planting time was advancede1
Outcome
number of total leavese1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
27.6, 30.8 and 33.0 leavese1
Qualifier
tendencye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“There was a tendency for number of total leaves to decrease as the planting time was advanced; 27.6, 30.8 and 33.0 leaves on tobacco planted on January 10, 30 and February 20, respectively (Table 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–661 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Width/length ratio of the harvested leaves on the lower stalk position decreased as later planting dates were used.

Organ / stage
harvested leaves on lower stalk positione1
Treatment
planting time was advancede1
Outcome
Width/length ratioe1
Direction
decreasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco (flue-cured tobacco variety, SC72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Width/length ratio of the harvested leaves on lower stalk position decreased as the planting time was advanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The area of harvested leaves was greater at each stalk position for tobacco planted on February 20 than for tobacco planted on January 10 or January 30.

Treatment
planted on February 20e1
Outcome
area of the harvested leavese1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
planted on January 10 or January 30e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The area of the harvested leaves was greater on each stalk position of tobacco planted on February 20 than that on the comparable stalk position of tobacco planted on January 10 or January 30”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvested leaf area did not clearly differ between tobacco planted on January 10 and tobacco planted on January 30.

Treatment
planted on January 10e1
Outcome
area of the harvested leavese2
Direction
not such a differencee1
Comparator
planted on January 30e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“though there was not such a difference between tobacco planted on January 10 and that planted on January 30”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1651 · show in text ↑
e2

“The area of the harvested leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1383 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry leaf weight per unit leaf area of harvested leaves was not superior for tobacco planted on February 20 compared with tobacco planted on other dates.

Treatment
planted on February 20e1
Outcome
dry leaf weight per unit leaf area of harvested leavese1
Direction
not superiore1
Comparator
planted on other daye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in dry leaf weight per unit leaf area of harvested leaves, tobacco planted on February 20 was not superior to tobacco planted on other day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper leaves of tobacco planted on February 20 were apparently inferior in dry leaf weight per unit leaf area to those of tobacco planted on January 30.

Organ / stage
upper leavese1
Treatment
planted on February 20e2
Outcome
dry leaf weight per unit leaf areae1
Direction
inferiore1
Qualifier
apparentlye1
Comparator
tobacco planted on January 30e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the upper leaves of this tobacco were apparently inferior to those of tobacco planted on January 30 in dry leaf weight per unit leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1827–1964 · show in text ↑
e2

“tobacco planted on February 20 was not superior to tobacco planted on other day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper-leaf dry weight per unit leaf area showed a similar difference for tobacco planted on January 10 compared with January 30.

Organ / stage
upper leavese1
Treatment
planted on January 10e1
Outcome
dry leaf weight per unit leaf areae2
Direction
similar differencee1
Comparator
planted on January 30e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“There was similar difference at the upper leaves between tobacco planted on January 10 and that planted on January 30”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1966–2083 · show in text ↑
e2

“the upper leaves of this tobacco were apparently inferior to those of tobacco planted on January 30 in dry leaf weight per unit leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1827–1964 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper leaves from tobacco planted on January 10 or February 20 may be slightly immature compared with those from January 30.

Organ / stage
upper leavese1
Treatment
planted on January 10 or February 20e1
Outcome
immaturee1
Comparator
planted on January 30e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“These results may indicate that the upper leaves harvested from tobacco planted on January 10 or February 20 seemed to be a little immature, in comparison with those harvested from tobacco planted on January 30”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2085–2295 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of flue-cured leaves per 10a increased as the planting time was retarded, from 269.0 kg to 363.3 kg across the January 10, January 30 and February 20 plots.

Treatment
planting time was retardede1
Outcome
Yield of the flue-cured leaves per 10ae1
Direction
increasede1
Value
269.0 kg, 282.8 kg and 363.3 kge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco (flue-cured tobacco variety, SC72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield of the flue-cured leaves per 10a increased as the planting time was retarded, i.e., 269.0 kg, 282.8 kg and 363.3 kg in the plots planted on January 10, 30 and February 20, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2309–2499 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Price per kg of cured leaves was inferior for the February 20 planting compared with the other plots.

Treatment
plot planted on Fcbruary 20e1
Outcome
price per kg of cured leavese1
Direction
inferiore1
Comparator
other plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco (flue-cured tobacco variety, SC72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“in the price per kg of cured leaves, the plot planted on Fcbruary 20 was inferior to other plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2510–2606 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest price per kg of cured leaves was obtained from the January 30 planting.

Treatment
plot planted on January 30e1
Outcome
price per kg of cured leavese1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco (flue-cured tobacco variety, SC72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest price per kg of cured leaves was gained in the plot planted on January 30”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2608–2693 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The last 10-day period of January is the best planting time for tobacco culture in Miyako Island.

Treatment
the last 10 day-period of Januarye1
Outcome
best planting timee1
Setting
Miyako Is.e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the last 10 day-period of January seems to be the best planting time for tobacco culture in Miyako Is.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2768–2870 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth of tobacco planted on January 10 was depressed in the early stage, attributed to slightly low temperature and small precipitation.

Organ / stage
in the early stagee1
Treatment
planted on January 10e1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
depressede1
Qualifier
slightly low temperature and small amount of precipitatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The growth of tobacco planted on January 10 was depressed on account of slightly low temperature and small amount of precipitation in the early stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–815 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco planted on January 10 showed vigorous growth in the later stage, which was prolonged to harvest.

Organ / stage
later stagee1
Treatment
planted on January 10e2
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
vigorouse1
Qualifier
prolonged to the harvesting timee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the later stage, this tobacco showed vigorous growth and its prosperous growth was prolonged to the harvesting time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–935 · show in text ↑
e2

“The growth of tobacco planted on January 10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–709 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco planted on February 20 grew vigorously in the early stage.

Organ / stage
in the early stagee1
Treatment
planted on February 20e1
Outcome
growthe2
Direction
vigorouslye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tobacco planted on February 20 grew vigorously in the early stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1002 · show in text ↑
e2

“The growth of tobacco planted on January 10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–709 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter production rate of tobacco planted on February 20 increased again, owing to heavy precipitation at harvest.

Treatment
planted on February 20e2
Outcome
rate of dry matter productione1
Direction
increased againe1
Qualifier
owing to much amount of precipitation in the harvesting timee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco (flue-cured tobacco variety, SC72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“its rate of dry matter production increased again owing to much amount of precipitation in the harvesting time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1118 · show in text ↑
e2

“Tobacco planted on February 20 grew vigorously in the early stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1002 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth process of tobacco planted on January 30 was comparatively moderate.

Treatment
planted on January 30e1
Outcome
growth processe1
Direction
comparatively moderatee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The growth process of tobacco planted on January 30 was comparatively moderate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1198 · show in text ↑

sowing time · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.