Abstract
Field experiments with fue-cured tobacco variety Cuibi 1 were carried out to study effects of transplanting time on growth and quality. Results showed that delayed seeding transplantation helped to speed up growth even when root extension period was shortened.Yield and quality were increased when transplanting date was delayed until February 15th, while decreased when transplanting date was delayed until March 8th. No signifcant effects on average price and rate of top quality leaves were found. Delayed transplanting date helped to reduce content of Nicotine and total nitrogen, while increased the ratio of reducing sugar to nicotine and the ratio of total nitrogen to nicotine. No difference was found as for content of total sugar, reducing sugar, potassium and the ratio of reducing sugar to total sugar.Early planting was also favorable for sensory quality.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed transplanting sped growth.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccot0
- Treatment
- delayed seeding transplantatione0
- Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- speed upe0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“delayed seeding transplantation helped to speed up growth even when root extension period was shortened”
t0“Effects of transplanting time on growth and quality of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting by February 15th increased yield and quality.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccot0
- Treatment
- transplanting date was delayed until February 15the0
- Outcome
- Yield and qualitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Yield and quality were increased when transplanting date was delayed until February 15th”
t0“Effects of transplanting time on growth and quality of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting by March 8th decreased yield and quality.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccot0
- Treatment
- transplanting date was delayed until March 8the0
- Outcome
- decreasede0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“while decreased when transplanting date was delayed until March 8th”
t0“Effects of transplanting time on growth and quality of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Average price and top-quality leaf rate were not significantly affected.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccot0
- Treatment
- transplanting timet0
- Outcome
- average price and rate of top quality leavese0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“No signifcant effects on average price and rate of top quality leaves were found”
t0“Effects of transplanting time on growth and quality of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed transplanting lowered nicotine and total nitrogen content.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccot0
- Treatment
- Delayed transplanting datee0
- Outcome
- content of Nicotine and total nitrogene0
- Direction
- reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Delayed transplanting date helped to reduce content of Nicotine and total nitrogen”
t0“Effects of transplanting time on growth and quality of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed transplanting increased reducing sugar:nicotine and total nitrogen:nicotine ratios.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccot0
- Treatment
- transplanting timet0
- Outcome
- the ratio of reducing sugar to nicotine and the ratio of total nitrogen to nicotinee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“increased the ratio of reducing sugar to nicotine and the ratio of total nitrogen to nicotine”
t0“Effects of transplanting time on growth and quality of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Total sugar, reducing sugar and potassium contents did not differ.
Verbatim
e0“No difference was found as for content of total sugar, reducing sugar, potassium”
t0“Effects of transplanting time on growth and quality of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Reducing sugar:total sugar ratio did not differ.
Verbatim
e0“No difference was found as for content of total sugar, reducing sugar, potassium and the ratio of reducing sugar to total sugar”
t0“Effects of transplanting time on growth and quality of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Early planting favored sensory quality.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Early planting was also favorable for sensory quality”
t0“Effects of transplanting time on growth and quality of flue-cured tobacco”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →sowing time · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →transplanting · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.