Paper · 1989 · Journal of Horticultural Science

The effect of total available photosynthetic photon flux on single truss tomato growth and production

R. J. McAvoy; H. W. Janes; B. L. Godfriaux; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
36
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryThe yield of tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Dombito, was compared under both supplemental high pressure sodium (HPS) lighting and natural greenhouse light conditions. HPS light (100 μ moles m−2s−1) was supplied over 18 hours daily (0400 to 2200 hours). All comparisons were made under single truss cropping conditions. A strong positive correlation (r=0.947) was observed between the total yield and total photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) received in the period from anthesis to harvest. Total PPF in the seedling stage (emergence to anthesis) was strongly correlated (r=−0.867) with timing of anthesis. Furthermore, changes in the leaf area ratio (LAR), specific leaf weight (SLW) and the relative growth rate (RGR) indicated that HPS lighting increased the rate of tomato seedling development without altering the basic pattern of development. The relationships, identified in this study, defining crop timing and crop yield represent the basis of a planning model that can be used for crop simulation and economic evaluation of the single truss system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total yield correlated positively with photosynthetic photon flux received from anthesis to harvest (r=0.947).

Treatment
total photosynthetic photon flux (PPF)e0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
positive correlatione0
Value
r=0.947e0
Qualifier
from anthesis to harveste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A strong positive correlation (r=0.947) was observed between the total yield and total photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) received in the period from anthesis to harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–504 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling-stage total PPF correlated negatively with timing of anthesis (r=−0.867).

Organ / stage
seedling stagee0
Treatment
Total PPFe0
Outcome
timing of anthesise0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
r=−0.867e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total PPF in the seedling stage (emergence to anthesis) was strongly correlated (r=−0.867) with timing of anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HPS lighting increased tomato seedling development rate without changing its basic pattern.

Treatment
HPS lightinge0
Outcome
rate of tomato seedling developmente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HPS lighting increased the rate of tomato seedling development without altering the basic pattern of development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HPS lighting did not alter the basic pattern of tomato seedling development.

Treatment
HPS lightinge0
Outcome
basic pattern of developmente0
Direction
without alteringe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HPS lighting increased the rate of tomato seedling development without altering the basic pattern of development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–862 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The identified crop timing and yield relationships provide a basis for a planning model for single-truss tomato systems.

Outcome
basis of a planning modele0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relationships, identified in this study, defining crop timing and crop yield represent the basis of a planning model that can be used for crop simulation and economic evaluation of the single truss system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑

sodium atom · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

light · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 155 positive, 71 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.