Paper · 1989 · Journal of Horticultural Science

Long-term improvement in the rooting of plum cuttings following apparent rejuvenation

B.H. Howard; O.P. Jones; J. Vasek

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
44
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryNine years after plants of the dwarfing plum rootstock Prunus insititia cv. Pixy were taken from culture in vitro and grown as stockplant hedges in the field, cuttings taken from these hedges rooted in greater percentages and produced more roots than cuttings taken from hedges of conventional stockplants. Pruning the stockplants severely in winter enhanced rooting of both the conventional and in vitro-derived cuttings compared with lighter pruning. The overall benefit due to severe pruning was similar to that from the in vitro-derived source, and the highest rooting level and most roots were produced by cuttings from severely pruned plants from the in vitro source. The nature of the enhanced rooting due to the micropropagation source and severe pruning was that roots developed earlier than in cuttings from conventional and lightly pruned stockplants, with the likely benefit of reducing cutting exposure to sub-optimal environmental conditions. The increased rooting potential was more consistent from year to year in winter cuttings made from the proximal portion of shoots which had completed their annual growth than in summer cuttings made from the distal portion of actively growing shoots in early summer. Shoot apices taken from field-grown stockplants in the eighth summer after leaving cúlture in vitro initially grew more vigorously than those from the conventional source when taken back into culture in vitro.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cuttings from in vitro-derived plum stockplant hedges rooted at greater percentages than conventional-source cuttings nine years after transfer to the field.

Taxon
Prunus insititia cv. Pixye0
Treatment
culture in vitroe0
Outcome
rooted in greater percentagese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
conventional stockplantse0
Setting
fielde0

Verbatim

e0

“Nine years after plants of the dwarfing plum rootstock Prunus insititia cv. Pixy were taken from culture in vitro and grown as stockplant hedges in the field, cuttings taken from these hedges rooted in greater percentages and produced more roots than cuttings taken from hedges of conventional stockplants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro-derived plum stockplant cuttings produced more roots than conventional-source cuttings.

Taxon
Prunus insititia cv. Pixye0
Treatment
culture in vitroe0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
conventional stockplantse0
Setting
fielde0

Verbatim

e0

“Nine years after plants of the dwarfing plum rootstock Prunus insititia cv. Pixy were taken from culture in vitro and grown as stockplant hedges in the field, cuttings taken from these hedges rooted in greater percentages and produced more roots than cuttings taken from hedges of conventional stockplants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe winter pruning enhanced rooting of conventional and in vitro-derived plum cuttings compared with lighter pruning.

Treatment
Pruning the stockplants severely in wintere0
Outcome
rootinge0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
lighter pruninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“plum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pruning the stockplants severely in winter enhanced rooting of both the conventional and in vitro-derived cuttings compared with lighter pruning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–459 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit of severe pruning was similar to the benefit of an in vitro-derived source.

Treatment
severe pruninge0
Outcome
overall benefite0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
in vitro-derived sourcee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“plum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“The overall benefit due to severe pruning was similar to that from the in vitro-derived source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–554 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cuttings from severely pruned, in vitro-derived plum stockplants had the highest rooting level.

Treatment
severely pruned plants from the in vitro sourcee0
Outcome
rooting levele0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“plum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest rooting level and most roots were produced by cuttings from severely pruned plants from the in vitro source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–679 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cuttings from severely pruned, in vitro-derived plum stockplants produced the most roots.

Treatment
severely pruned plants from the in vitro sourcee0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
moste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“plum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest rooting level and most roots were produced by cuttings from severely pruned plants from the in vitro source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots developed earlier in in vitro-derived and severely pruned plum cuttings than in conventional and lightly pruned cuttings.

Outcome
roots developede0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
conventional and lightly pruned stockplantse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“plum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“roots developed earlier than in cuttings from conventional and lightly pruned stockplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–868 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher rooting potential was more consistent between years in proximal winter cuttings from completed shoots than distal summer cuttings from actively growing shoots.

Organ / stage
proximal portion of shootse0
Outcome
rooting potentiale0
Direction
more consistente0
Comparator
summer cuttings made from the distal portion of actively growing shootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“plum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increased rooting potential was more consistent from year to year in winter cuttings made from the proximal portion of shoots which had completed their annual growth than in summer cuttings made from the distal portion of actively growing shoots in early summer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot apices from in vitro-derived field plum stockplants initially grew more vigorously in culture than conventional-source apices.

Organ / stage
Shoot apicese0
Treatment
cúlture in vitroe0
Outcome
grewe0
Direction
more vigorouslye0
Comparator
conventional sourcee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“plum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“Shoot apices taken from field-grown stockplants in the eighth summer after leaving cúlture in vitro initially grew more vigorously than those from the conventional source when taken back into culture in vitro.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1440 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 8 positive, 6 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.