Paper · 2014 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Bambara groundnut/maize intercropping: Effects of planting densities in Southern guinea savanna of Nigeria

Adu Alhassan Godwin; Onyilo Egbe Moses

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
18
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in 2010 and 2011 at the Teaching and Research Farm, Federal University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Nigeria. The aim was to determine the suitability of some landraces of bambara groundnut for intercropping at varying planting densities with maize. The experiment was a 2×3×3 split-split plot laid in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Intercropping decreased number of pods and grain yields of bambara groundnut component. Number of pods and grain yields increased with increased planting density. Productivity indices indicated that bambara groundnut/maize intercropping was productive, and maize was the dominant component. The marginal rate of returns for the best combinations was 116.13%, suggesting profitability of the intercropping systems. Key words: Bambara groundnuts, maize, intercropping, planting density.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping decreased bambara groundnut number of pods.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
number of podse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bambara groundnut/maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intercropping decreased number of pods and grain yields of bambara groundnut component.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping decreased bambara groundnut grain yields.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bambara groundnut/maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intercropping decreased number of pods and grain yields of bambara groundnut component.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

increased planting density increased bambara groundnut Number of pods.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Treatment
increased planting densitye0
Outcome
Number of podse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bambara groundnut/maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“Number of pods and grain yields increased with increased planting density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

increased planting density increased bambara groundnut grain yields.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Treatment
increased planting densitye0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bambara groundnut/maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“Number of pods and grain yields increased with increased planting density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–552 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bambara groundnut and maize intercropping was productive.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Outcome
intercropping was productivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bambara groundnut/maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“Productivity indices indicated that bambara groundnut/maize intercropping was productive, and maize was the dominant component.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–680 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize was the dominant intercropping component.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
maize was the dominant componente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bambara groundnut/maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“Productivity indices indicated that bambara groundnut/maize intercropping was productive, and maize was the dominant component.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–680 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best intercropping combinations had a marginal return rate of 116.13%.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Outcome
marginal rate of returnse0
Value
116.13%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bambara groundnut/maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“The marginal rate of returns for the best combinations was 116.13%, suggesting profitability of the intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–803 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Vigna subterranea (Bambara groundnut)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.