Paper · 2023 · University of Khartoum Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Production Potential and Some Agronomic Practices of Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterrenea L). Verdc) Under Rainfed Conditions of South Gedarif Area

Ibrahim Elsadig Ibrahim; Ali ElToum Hassan; Jamal Elkhair

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were executed for two successive seasons(2009 and 2010), at the southern area of Gedarif State with the objectiveof studying the influence of sowing date and population density on theproductivity of a land race Bambara groundnut. Four sowing dates, viz.,27th of June, 9th, 19th and 27th of July and five combinations of inter-row*intra-row spacings, 40cmx30cm, 40x20, 30x30, 30x20 and 20x20,were used during both seasons. The data recorded in both seasons wereplant height, canopy width, 100 seed weight, shelling % and pod yieldton/ha. Results revealed highly significant differences in most ofmeasured parameters with respect to sowing date. Early sowing resultedin a significantly higher pod yield (4.3 ton/ha) when compared to latesowings (i.e. 2.3, 1.3 and 0.94 ton/ha for 9th, 19th and 27th of July,respectively). Variable plant spacing significantly affected pod yieldduring the first season, while no significant variation was observed duringthe second season. Nevertheless, higher yields were obtained with widerspacings. Accordingly, the early sowing from late June to early July issuggested as optimum sowing date for Bambara groundnut with row-cropspacings of 40-30cm inter-row and 30-20cm intra-row for the rain fedconditions of south Gedarif area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing gave a significantly higher pod yield than late sowings.

Taxon
Bambara GroundnutVigna subterraneat0
Treatment
Early sowinge1
Outcome
pod yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
4.3 ton/hae1
Comparator
late sowingse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterrenea L). Verdc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“Early sowing resulted in a significantly higher pod yield (4.3 ton/ha) when compared to late sowings (i.e. 2.3, 1.3 and 0.94 ton/ha for 9th, 19th and 27th of July, respectively)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 662–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable plant spacing significantly affected pod yield in the first season.

Taxon
Bambara GroundnutVigna subterraneat0
Treatment
Variable plant spacinge2
Outcome
pod yielde2
Qualifier
during the first seasone2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterrenea L). Verdc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–100 · show in text ↑
e2

“Variable plant spacing significantly affected pod yield during the first season”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 838–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant spacing had no significant effect on pod yield in the second season.

Taxon
Bambara GroundnutVigna subterraneat0
Treatment
Variable plant spacinge2
Outcome
pod yielde2
Direction
no significant variatione3
Qualifier
during the second seasone3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterrenea L). Verdc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–100 · show in text ↑
e2

“Variable plant spacing significantly affected pod yield during the first season”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 838–916 · show in text ↑
e3

“while no significant variation was observed during the second season”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 918–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacings gave higher yields.

Taxon
Bambara GroundnutVigna subterraneat0
Treatment
wider spacingse4
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterrenea L). Verdc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nevertheless, higher yields were obtained with wider spacings”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 987–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date had highly significant differences on most measured parameters.

Taxon
Bambara GroundnutVigna subterraneat0
Treatment
sowing datee5
Outcome
measured parameterse5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterrenea L). Verdc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–100 · show in text ↑
e5

“Results revealed highly significant differences in most ofmeasured parameters with respect to sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–660 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing from late June to early July is suggested as the optimum sowing date.

Taxon
Bambara GroundnutVigna subterraneat0
Outcome
optimum sowing datee6
Qualifier
from late June to early Julye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterrenea L). Verdc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–100 · show in text ↑
e6

“the early sowing from late June to early July issuggested as optimum sowing date for Bambara groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1164 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Row-crop spacings of 40-30 cm inter-row and 30-20 cm intra-row are suggested for rainfed conditions.

Taxon
Bambara GroundnutVigna subterraneat0
Outcome
row-cropspacingse7
Value
40-30cm inter-row and 30-20cm intra-rowe7
Qualifier
for the rain fedconditions of south Gedarif areae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterrenea L). Verdc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–100 · show in text ↑
e7

“row-cropspacings of 40-30cm inter-row and 30-20cm intra-row for the rain fedconditions of south Gedarif area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1278 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Vigna subterranea (Bambara groundnut)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sowing time · yield · Vigna subterranea (Bambara groundnut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.