Paper · 2000 · Experimental Agriculture

INFLUENCE OF SOWING DATE ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF BAMBARA GROUNDNUT LANDRACES IN TANZANIA

S. T. COLLINSON; K. P. SIBUGA; A. J. P. TARIMO; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
39
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sequential sowings were carried out at Dodoma, Tanzania, to examine the effect of changing climatic parameters on the growth and yield of bambara groundnut ( Vigna subterranea ). Sowings took place on 4 January, 4 February and 4 March 1994; 4 and 24 January, and 13 February 1995; 4 and 21 January, and 7 February 1996. Rainfall during the crop life cycle varied from 163 to 611 mm, mean photoperiod from 11.82 to 12.09 h d −1 and mean temperature from 22.6 to 24.4 °C. In 1994, the highest pod yields were achieved at the earliest sowing date, with a maximum of 2.87 and 1.42 t ha −1 for the red- and cream-seeded landraces, representing pod harvest indices of 0.56 and 0.34 respectively. A 30-d delay in sowing caused >60% reduction in pod yield, and a further 30-d delay resulted in no pods at all. Similarly, in 1995 successive delays in sowing caused dramatic yield declines, and the maximum yield was much lower, at 0.44 t ha −1 . In 1996 there was no significant difference in pod yields between the two early sowing dates for the red-seeded landrace and yields were again lower than in 1994 with a maximum of 1.02 t ha −1 . Differences in dry matter production between sowings and years were attributed mainly to differences in the amount and distribution of rainfall and to declining temperatures towards the end of the season; however, partitioning to pods was remarkably consistent across sowings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1994 the earliest sowing gave the highest pod yields in both landraces.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Treatment
earliest sowing datee0
Outcome
pod yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1994, the highest pod yields were achieved at the earliest sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“BAMBARA GROUNDNUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The red-seeded landrace reached a maximum pod yield of 2.87 t ha −1 in 1994.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Material
red-e0
Outcome
maximume0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.87e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a maximum of 2.87 and 1.42 t ha −1 for the red- and cream-seeded landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“BAMBARA GROUNDNUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cream-seeded landrace reached a maximum pod yield of 1.42 t ha −1 in 1994.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Material
cream-seedede0
Outcome
maximume0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.42 t ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a maximum of 2.87 and 1.42 t ha −1 for the red- and cream-seeded landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“BAMBARA GROUNDNUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The red-seeded landrace had a 1994 pod harvest index of 0.56.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Outcome
pod harvest indicese0
Value
0.56e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“representing pod harvest indices of 0.56 and 0.34 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“BAMBARA GROUNDNUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cream-seeded landrace had a 1994 pod harvest index of 0.34.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Outcome
pod harvest indicese0
Value
0.34e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“representing pod harvest indices of 0.56 and 0.34 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“BAMBARA GROUNDNUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying sowing 30 days reduced pod yield by more than 60%.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Treatment
30-d delay in sowinge0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
>60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 30-d delay in sowing caused >60% reduction in pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“BAMBARA GROUNDNUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A further 30-day sowing delay resulted in no pods.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Treatment
a further 30-d delaye0
Outcome
no pods at alle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a further 30-d delay resulted in no pods at all.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“BAMBARA GROUNDNUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Successive sowing delays in 1995 caused large yield declines.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Treatment
successive delays in sowinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
declinese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 1995 successive delays in sowing caused dramatic yield declines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“BAMBARA GROUNDNUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum 1995 pod yield was 0.44 t ha −1.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
much lowere0
Value
0.44 t ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum yield was much lower, at 0.44 t ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“BAMBARA GROUNDNUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1996 the red-seeded landrace had no significant pod yield difference between the two early sowings.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Material
red-seeded landracee0
Treatment
two early sowing datese0
Outcome
pod yieldse0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
two early sowing datese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1996 there was no significant difference in pod yields between the two early sowing dates for the red-seeded landrace”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“BAMBARA GROUNDNUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum 1996 yield was 1.02 t ha −1 and was below the 1994 yield.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
1.02 t ha −1e0
Comparator
1994e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yields were again lower than in 1994 with a maximum of 1.02 t ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“BAMBARA GROUNDNUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed dry matter differences among sowings and years mainly to rainfall distribution and late-season cooling.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Outcome
Differences in dry matter productione0
Qualifier
differences in the amount and distribution of rainfall and to declining temperatures towards the end of the seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in dry matter production between sowings and years were attributed mainly to differences in the amount and distribution of rainfall and to declining temperatures towards the end of the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1335 · show in text ↑
t0

“BAMBARA GROUNDNUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partitioning to pods was remarkably consistent across sowings.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Outcome
partitioning to podse0
Direction
remarkably consistente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“partitioning to pods was remarkably consistent across sowings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1408 · show in text ↑
t0

“BAMBARA GROUNDNUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Vigna subterranea (Bambara groundnut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.