Paper · 1989 · Functional Ecology

Addendum: Canopy Organization and Foliage Photosynthetic Capacity in a Broad-Leaved Evergreen Montane Forest

D. Y. Hollinger

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
173
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The spatial and physical characteristics of foliage varied systematically with canopy height in a broad-leaved evergreen forest of Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides (Hook.f.) Poole (mountain beech) in the Craigieburn Range, South Island, New Zealand. Leaf inclination angle, leaf weight per unit area, leaf nitrogen concentration, leaf photosynthetic capacity and leaf reflectance of photosynthetically active radiation all decreased with depth in the canopy. These changes will result in a more uniform distribution of photosynthetically active radiation through the canopy and a greater canopy carbon gain than possible in canopies composed of randomly oriented leaves with constant physical properties. The mean leaf area index of the Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides foliage was 6 7 and mean branch silhouette area index was 1 4. Mistletoe (Alepisflavida [Hook.f.] Tiegh) was present in the canopy and had a leaf area index of 0-14, and a stem silhouette area index of 0-02. Total beech and mistletoe foliage biomass was 1183 and 36g m-2 respectively and total beech and mistletoe foliage nitrogen mass was 12 3 and 037g m2. Key-words: Leaf orientation, leaf area index, leaf nitrogen, Nothofagus, photosynthetic capacity, mistletoe

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf inclination angle, leaf weight per unit area and leaf nitrogen concentration decreased with canopy depth

Taxon
Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioidesNothofagus cliffortioidese0
Outcome
Leaf inclination angle, leaf weight per unit area, leaf nitrogen concentratione1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
with depth in the canopye1
Setting
Craigieburn Range, South Island, New Zealande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus cliffortioides
Nothofagus cliffortioides · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spatial and physical characteristics of foliage varied systematically with canopy height in a broad-leaved evergreen forest of Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides (Hook.f.) Poole (mountain beech) in the Craigieburn Range, South Island, New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf inclination angle, leaf weight per unit area, leaf nitrogen concentration, leaf photosynthetic capacity and leaf reflectance of photosynthetically active radiation all decreased with depth in the canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–464 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf photosynthetic capacity and leaf reflectance decreased with canopy depth

Taxon
Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioidesNothofagus cliffortioidese0
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic capacity and leaf reflectance of photosynthetically active radiatione1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
with depth in the canopye1
Setting
Craigieburn Range, South Island, New Zealande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus cliffortioides
Nothofagus cliffortioides · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spatial and physical characteristics of foliage varied systematically with canopy height in a broad-leaved evergreen forest of Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides (Hook.f.) Poole (mountain beech) in the Craigieburn Range, South Island, New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf inclination angle, leaf weight per unit area, leaf nitrogen concentration, leaf photosynthetic capacity and leaf reflectance of photosynthetically active radiation all decreased with depth in the canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–464 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Depth-related leaf changes are expected to give greater canopy carbon gain

Taxon
Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioidesNothofagus cliffortioidese0
Outcome
greater canopy carbon gaine2
Qualifier
more uniform distribution of photosynthetically active radiation through the canopye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus cliffortioides
Nothofagus cliffortioides · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spatial and physical characteristics of foliage varied systematically with canopy height in a broad-leaved evergreen forest of Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides (Hook.f.) Poole (mountain beech) in the Craigieburn Range, South Island, New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255 · show in text ↑
e2

“These changes will result in a more uniform distribution of photosynthetically active radiation through the canopy and a greater canopy carbon gain than possible in canopies composed of randomly oriented leaves with constant physical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–710 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean leaf area index of the Nothofagus foliage was 6.7

Taxon
Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioidesNothofagus cliffortioidese3
Outcome
mean leaf area indexe3
Value
6 7e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus cliffortioides
Nothofagus cliffortioides · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spatial and physical characteristics of foliage varied systematically with canopy height in a broad-leaved evergreen forest of Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides (Hook.f.) Poole (mountain beech) in the Craigieburn Range, South Island, New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255 · show in text ↑
e3

“The mean leaf area index of the Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides foliage was 6 7 and mean branch silhouette area index was 1 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–845 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean branch silhouette area index of the Nothofagus canopy was 1.4

Taxon
Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioidesNothofagus cliffortioidese3
Outcome
mean branch silhouette area indexe3
Value
1 4e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus cliffortioides
Nothofagus cliffortioides · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spatial and physical characteristics of foliage varied systematically with canopy height in a broad-leaved evergreen forest of Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides (Hook.f.) Poole (mountain beech) in the Craigieburn Range, South Island, New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255 · show in text ↑
e3

“The mean leaf area index of the Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides foliage was 6 7 and mean branch silhouette area index was 1 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–845 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mistletoe leaf area index in the canopy was 0.14

Taxon
Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioidesNothofagus cliffortioidese0
Interactor
Alepisflavidae4parasite
Outcome
leaf area indexe4
Value
0-14e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus cliffortioides
Nothofagus cliffortioides · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spatial and physical characteristics of foliage varied systematically with canopy height in a broad-leaved evergreen forest of Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides (Hook.f.) Poole (mountain beech) in the Craigieburn Range, South Island, New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255 · show in text ↑
e4

“Mistletoe (Alepisflavida [Hook.f.] Tiegh) was present in the canopy and had a leaf area index of 0-14, and a stem silhouette area index of 0-02”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–990 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mistletoe stem silhouette area index in the canopy was 0.02

Taxon
Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioidesNothofagus cliffortioidese0
Interactor
Alepisflavidae4parasite
Outcome
stem silhouette area indexe4
Value
0-02e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus cliffortioides
Nothofagus cliffortioides · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spatial and physical characteristics of foliage varied systematically with canopy height in a broad-leaved evergreen forest of Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides (Hook.f.) Poole (mountain beech) in the Craigieburn Range, South Island, New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255 · show in text ↑
e4

“Mistletoe (Alepisflavida [Hook.f.] Tiegh) was present in the canopy and had a leaf area index of 0-14, and a stem silhouette area index of 0-02”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–990 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total beech foliage biomass was 1183 g m-2

Taxon
Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioidesNothofagus cliffortioidese0
Outcome
foliage biomasse5
Value
1183e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus cliffortioides
Nothofagus cliffortioides · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spatial and physical characteristics of foliage varied systematically with canopy height in a broad-leaved evergreen forest of Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides (Hook.f.) Poole (mountain beech) in the Craigieburn Range, South Island, New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255 · show in text ↑
e5

“Total beech and mistletoe foliage biomass was 1183 and 36g m-2 respectively and total beech and mistletoe foliage nitrogen mass was 12 3 and 037g m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1140 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mistletoe foliage biomass was 36 g m-2

Taxon
Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioidesNothofagus cliffortioidese0
Interactor
Alepisflavidae4parasite
Outcome
foliage biomasse5
Value
36g m-2e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus cliffortioides
Nothofagus cliffortioides · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spatial and physical characteristics of foliage varied systematically with canopy height in a broad-leaved evergreen forest of Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides (Hook.f.) Poole (mountain beech) in the Craigieburn Range, South Island, New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255 · show in text ↑
e4

“Mistletoe (Alepisflavida [Hook.f.] Tiegh) was present in the canopy and had a leaf area index of 0-14, and a stem silhouette area index of 0-02”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–990 · show in text ↑
e5

“Total beech and mistletoe foliage biomass was 1183 and 36g m-2 respectively and total beech and mistletoe foliage nitrogen mass was 12 3 and 037g m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1140 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total beech foliage nitrogen mass was 12.3

Taxon
Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioidesNothofagus cliffortioidese0
Outcome
foliage nitrogen masse5
Value
12 3e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus cliffortioides
Nothofagus cliffortioides · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spatial and physical characteristics of foliage varied systematically with canopy height in a broad-leaved evergreen forest of Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides (Hook.f.) Poole (mountain beech) in the Craigieburn Range, South Island, New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255 · show in text ↑
e5

“Total beech and mistletoe foliage biomass was 1183 and 36g m-2 respectively and total beech and mistletoe foliage nitrogen mass was 12 3 and 037g m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1140 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mistletoe foliage nitrogen mass was 0.37 g m-2

Taxon
Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioidesNothofagus cliffortioidese0
Interactor
Alepisflavidae4parasite
Outcome
foliage nitrogen masse5
Value
037g m2e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus cliffortioides
Nothofagus cliffortioides · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spatial and physical characteristics of foliage varied systematically with canopy height in a broad-leaved evergreen forest of Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides (Hook.f.) Poole (mountain beech) in the Craigieburn Range, South Island, New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255 · show in text ↑
e4

“Mistletoe (Alepisflavida [Hook.f.] Tiegh) was present in the canopy and had a leaf area index of 0-14, and a stem silhouette area index of 0-02”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–990 · show in text ↑
e5

“Total beech and mistletoe foliage biomass was 1183 and 36g m-2 respectively and total beech and mistletoe foliage nitrogen mass was 12 3 and 037g m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1140 · show in text ↑