Paper · 2014 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Chlorophyll and macronutrients content in leaf tissue of Musa sp Prata-An under fertigation

Soares de Melo Alberto; Dias Silva Junior Carlos; Dantas Fernandes Pedro; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The banana (Musa sp.) crop is notable for its social and economic importance in tropical and subtropical regions of world. In Brazil, despite being a main banana producer, its production is considered low, mainly due to water and nutrient shortages in soils. This fact motivated this study; so, it aimed to evaluate chlorophyll and macronutrients content in leaf tissue of banana ‘Prata-Anã’ (AAB) under fertigation with doses of nitrogen and potassium. It were evaluated chlorophyll a, b and total and leaf contents of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg) and calcium (Ca) in banana trees grown in an Ultisol on the coastal tablelands of Sergipe State, Brazil. The experiment was conducted in the field, in a 42 factorial with four randomized blocks. Two factors with four levels were tested: nitrogen (0; 350; 700 and 1050, in kg ha-1 of N, as urea) and potassium (0; 400; 800 and 1200, in kg ha-1 of K2O, as potassium chloride). Increasing N applied through irrigation enhances leaf nitrogen until approximately 631.08 kg ha-1 of N, while chlorophyll total remains constant after 250 kg ha-1. Phosphorus and calcium are increased due to high doses of N, however, magnesium and potassium in the leaves are reduced. High doses of K increase leaf content of K until estimated dose of 698.07 kg ha-1 and reduce calcium and magnesium of banana ‘Prata-Anã’. Key words: Musa sp., mineral fertilizer, nutrition, photosynthetic pigments, nutrient splitting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen fertigation enhanced banana leaf nitrogen up to about 631.08 kg ha-1 N.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
N applied through irrigatione0
Outcome
leaf nitrogene0
Direction
enhancese0
Value
631.08 kg ha-1 of Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing N applied through irrigation enhances leaf nitrogen until approximately 631.08 kg ha-1 of N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1057 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana ‘Prata-Anã’ (AAB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll remained constant above 250 kg ha-1 nitrogen.

Taxon
bananae2
Treatment
N applied through irrigatione1
Outcome
chlorophyll totale0
Direction
remains constante0
Value
250 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll total remains constant after 250 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1117 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing N applied through irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–994 · show in text ↑
e2

“banana ‘Prata-Anã’ (AAB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen doses increased banana leaf phosphorus and calcium.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
high doses of Ne0
Outcome
Phosphorus and calciume0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus and calcium are increased due to high doses of N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1178 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana ‘Prata-Anã’ (AAB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen doses reduced banana leaf magnesium and potassium.

Taxon
bananae2
Treatment
high doses of Ne1
Outcome
magnesium and potassium in the leavese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“magnesium and potassium in the leaves are reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1238 · show in text ↑
e1

“high doses of N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1178 · show in text ↑
e2

“banana ‘Prata-Anã’ (AAB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High potassium doses increased banana leaf potassium up to an estimated dose of 698.07 kg ha-1.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
High doses of Ke0
Outcome
leaf content of Ke0
Direction
increasee0
Value
698.07 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“High doses of K increase leaf content of K until estimated dose of 698.07 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1321 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana ‘Prata-Anã’ (AAB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High potassium doses reduced banana leaf calcium and magnesium.

Taxon
banana ‘Prata-Anã’e0
Treatment
High doses of Ke0
Outcome
calcium and magnesiume0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“High doses of K increase leaf content of K until estimated dose of 698.07 kg ha-1 and reduce calcium and magnesium of banana ‘Prata-Anã’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1376 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: content · MusaPositive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.