Paper · 2016 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Study of physiological growth indices of chickpea in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) + mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping system under different weed management practices

Ranjeet Kour; B. C. Sharma; Anil Kumar; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiments were carried out during rabi season of 2009-10 and 2010-11 at the Research Farm of Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha to assess the physiological growth indices in chickpea+mustard intercropping system under different weed management practices. The significant superiority of replacement series treatment for leaf area index of chickpea over additive series treatment was noticed. The crop of sole chickpea was followed by replacement and additive series treatments in recording highest dry matter, crop growth rate and net assimilation rate values. Sole stand of chickpea recorded numerically higher relative growth rate (RGR) followed by replacement and additive series treatments. Weed free treatment recorded numerically the highest crop growth rate (CGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR) of chickpea at all the stages of observation. Sole chickpea produced higher yield as compared to chickpea+mustard when grown in additive and replacement series in the respective order.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacement series gave significantly higher leaf area index of chickpea than additive series

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
replacement seriese1
Outcome
leaf area indexe1
Direction
superioritye1
Comparator
additive seriese1
Setting
Jammue0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiments were carried out during rabi season of 2009-10 and 2010-11 at the Research Farm of Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“The significant superiority of replacement series treatment for leaf area index of chickpea over additive series treatment was noticed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole chickpea had the highest dry matter, crop growth rate and net assimilation rate, followed by replacement and additive series

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Treatment
sole chickpeae2
Outcome
dry matter, crop growth rate and net assimilation ratee2
Direction
higheste2
Comparator
replacement and additive series treatmentse2
Setting
Jammue0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiments were carried out during rabi season of 2009-10 and 2010-11 at the Research Farm of Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–187 · show in text ↑
e2

“The crop of sole chickpea was followed by replacement and additive series treatments in recording highest dry matter, crop growth rate and net assimilation rate values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole chickpea numerically had higher relative growth rate than replacement and additive series

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume3
Treatment
Sole stand of chickpeae3
Outcome
relative growth rate (RGR)e3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
replacement and additive series treatmentse3
Setting
Jammue0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiments were carried out during rabi season of 2009-10 and 2010-11 at the Research Farm of Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–187 · show in text ↑
e3

“Sole stand of chickpea recorded numerically higher relative growth rate (RGR) followed by replacement and additive series treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment numerically gave the highest crop growth rate and net assimilation rate of chickpea

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume4
Treatment
Weed free treatmente4
Outcome
crop growth rate (CGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR)e4
Direction
higheste4
Setting
Jammue0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiments were carried out during rabi season of 2009-10 and 2010-11 at the Research Farm of Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–187 · show in text ↑
e4

“Weed free treatment recorded numerically the highest crop growth rate (CGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR) of chickpea at all the stages of observation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole chickpea produced higher yield than chickpea+mustard intercropping in additive and replacement series

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume5
Treatment
Sole chickpeae5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
chickpea+mustarde5
Setting
Jammue0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiments were carried out during rabi season of 2009-10 and 2010-11 at the Research Farm of Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–187 · show in text ↑
e5

“Sole chickpea produced higher yield as compared to chickpea+mustard when grown in additive and replacement series in the respective order”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1045 · show in text ↑

herbicide · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.