Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Weed-free treatment numerically gave the highest crop growth rate and net assimilation rate of chickpea

A claim from Study of physiological growth indices of chickpea in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) + mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping system under different weed management practices · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment numerically gave the highest crop growth rate and net assimilation rate of chickpea

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume4
Treatment
Weed free treatmente4
Outcome
crop growth rate (CGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR)e4
Direction
higheste4
Setting
Jammue0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiments were carried out during rabi season of 2009-10 and 2010-11 at the Research Farm of Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–187
e4

“Weed free treatment recorded numerically the highest crop growth rate (CGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR) of chickpea at all the stages of observation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–906

Title

Study of physiological growth indices of chickpea in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) + mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping system under different weed management practices

Ranjeet Kour; B. C. Sharma; Anil Kumar; et al. Legume Research - An International Journal 2016. doi:10.18805/lr.v0iof.9439

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-4010ea2583a49324aa5fb971e6e743486b0f04839f54e413a888c66630871565 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

herbicide · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.