Paper · 1973 · Chagyo Kenkyu Hokoku (Tea Research Journal)

Influences of Plucking Time and Disposition after Pulcking of the First Crop of the Tea Plant upon Yield and Quality in Each Plucking Season in Cold Locality

Hiroko FUCHINOUE; Isamu YAGI

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

1. These studies were performed to find out the influences of the plucking time of the first crop and three different dispositions after each plucking upon the yield and quality. These dispositions are noninterference, trimming on 10 days after plucking of the first crop and plucking of late shoots.2. As to the plucking of the first crop, it was proved that about 60-65% of banjhi shoots to the total ones showed the most effective results on the yield and quality.3. The deterioration in the quality of the second crop was brought about by noninterference after the plucking of the first crop, owing to the uneven ripening of the new shoots of the second crop.4. In the year when the lower class tea was wanted in the market, the plucking of late shoots between the first and the second crop season brought about the advantageous results using tea var. "Yabukita", but not advantageous using "Sayamamidori".

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plucking at about 60-65% banjhi shoots gave the best yield and quality.

Taxon
Tea Plantt0
Treatment
about 60-65% of banjhi shootse0
Outcome
yield and qualitye0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
60-65%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“about 60-65% of banjhi shoots to the total ones showed the most effective results on the yield and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Noninterference after first plucking worsened second-crop quality.

Taxon
Tea Plantt0
Treatment
noninterference after the plucking of the first crope0
Outcome
quality of the second crope0
Direction
deterioratione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The deterioration in the quality of the second crop was brought about by noninterference after the plucking of the first crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-shoot plucking was advantageous for Yabukita in a lower-class tea market year.

Taxon
teae0
Material
Yabukitae0
Treatment
plucking of late shootse0
Outcome
advantageous resultse0
Direction
advantageouse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“plucking of late shoots between the first and the second crop season brought about the advantageous results using tea var. "Yabukita"”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-shoot plucking was not advantageous for Sayamamidori.

Taxon
Tea Plantt0
Material
Sayamamidorie0
Treatment
plucking of late shootse0
Outcome
not advantageouse0
Direction
not advantageouse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“plucking of late shoots between the first and the second crop season brought about the advantageous results using tea var. "Yabukita", but not advantageous using "Sayamamidori".”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–93 · show in text ↑