Paper · 2011 · International Research Journal of Plant Science

Use of allelopathic water extract of field crops for weed control in wheat

Mehboob Elahi; Z. A. Cheema; Shahzad Maqsood; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two field trials were conducted at Research Area, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan. In first study water extracts of sorghum, sunflower, rice and brassica were tank mixed each @ 12 L ha-1 with each other and also with reduced rates of phenoxaprop-p-ethyl (287 g ha-1) and isoproturon (333 g ha-1). Both herbicides at recommended rates (862 and 1000 g ha-1 respectively) were used as standard treatments. In second study sorghum and sunflower water extracts @ 12 and 15 l ha-1 were combined with each other in 3:2 ratio of affinity as well as recommended dose of affinity and isoproturon were used as a standard. A weedy check was also included in both experiments for comparison. Result of first study revealed that weed dry matter production by sorgaab, sunfaab and rice water extracts with one third dose of isoproturon was 92 and 93% at 40 and 70 DAS. It was superior (61 and 62% at 40 and 70 DAS) to the label dose of phenoxaprop-p-ethyl and increased grain yield by 22.79%; it was also economical, giving higher net returns and percent marginal returns whereas another economical treatment was isoproturon @ 1000 g ha-1 which gave 93% reduction in weed dry weight and 30% increase in grain yield. Results of second study revealed that weed dry matter production by sorgaab, sunfaab and 1/2 dose of affinity was 99%(100 DAS) which increased grain yield by 38.02%; it was also economical, giving higher net benefits and marginal rate of return whereas sorgaab + sunfaab @ 12 L ha-1 two sprays (40 and 60 DAS) was also an economical treatment and increased grain yield by 6.77%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A three extract mixture with one third isoproturon reduced weed dry matter by 92% at 40 DAS.

Treatment
sorgaab, sunfaab and rice water extracts with one third dose of isoproturone0
Outcome
weed dry matter productione0
Value
92e0
Qualifier
at 40e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed dry matter production by sorgaab, sunfaab and rice water extracts with one third dose of isoproturon was 92 and 93% at 40 and 70 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same mixture reduced weed dry matter by 93% at 70 DAS.

Treatment
sorgaab, sunfaab and rice water extracts with one third dose of isoproturone0
Outcome
weed dry matter productione0
Value
93%e0
Qualifier
70 DASe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed dry matter production by sorgaab, sunfaab and rice water extracts with one third dose of isoproturon was 92 and 93% at 40 and 70 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extract and isoproturon mixture was superior to label dose phenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 40 DAS.

Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Value
61e0
Qualifier
at 40e0
Comparator
label dose of phenoxaprop-p-ethyle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was superior (61 and 62% at 40 and 70 DAS) to the label dose of phenoxaprop-p-ethyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extract and isoproturon mixture was superior to label dose phenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 70 DAS.

Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Value
62%e0
Qualifier
70 DASe0
Comparator
label dose of phenoxaprop-p-ethyle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was superior (61 and 62% at 40 and 70 DAS) to the label dose of phenoxaprop-p-ethyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extract and isoproturon mixture raised wheat grain yield by 22.79%.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.79%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased grain yield by 22.79%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extract and isoproturon mixture gave higher net returns and marginal returns.

Outcome
net returns and percent marginal returnse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was also economical, giving higher net returns and percent marginal returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon at 1000 g ha-1 reduced weed dry weight by 93%.

Treatment
isoproturon @ 1000 g ha-1e0
Outcome
weed dry weighte0
Direction
reductione0
Value
93%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isoproturon @ 1000 g ha-1 which gave 93% reduction in weed dry weight and 30% increase in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon at 1000 g ha-1 increased grain yield by 30%.

Treatment
isoproturon @ 1000 g ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isoproturon @ 1000 g ha-1 which gave 93% reduction in weed dry weight and 30% increase in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second study mixture achieved 99% weed dry matter control at 100 DAS.

Treatment
sorgaab, sunfaab and 1/2 dose of affinitye0
Outcome
weed dry matter productione0
Value
99%e0
Qualifier
100 DASe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed dry matter production by sorgaab, sunfaab and 1/2 dose of affinity was 99%(100 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1366 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second study mixture raised grain yield by 38.02%.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
38.02%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which increased grain yield by 38.02%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second study mixture gave higher net benefits and marginal rate of return.

Outcome
net benefits and marginal rate of returne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was also economical, giving higher net benefits and marginal rate of return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1484 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of sorgaab and sunfaab raised grain yield by 6.77%.

Treatment
sorgaab + sunfaab @ 12 L ha-1 two sprays (40 and 60 DAS)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.77%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorgaab + sunfaab @ 12 L ha-1 two sprays (40 and 60 DAS) was also an economical treatment and increased grain yield by 6.77%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of sorgaab and sunfaab were economical.

Outcome
economical treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorgaab + sunfaab @ 12 L ha-1 two sprays (40 and 60 DAS) was also an economical treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1582 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Oryza sativa · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

isoproturon · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 72 positive, 2 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

botanical · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 41 positive, 1 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.