Paper · 2014 · Asian Journal of Crop Science

Effects of Different Levels of Molybdenum on Uptake of Nutrients in Rice Cultivars

H. Zakikhani; Y.M. Khanif; A.R. Anuar; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
21
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A hydroponic trial was carried out to determine the effect of molybdenum (Mo) on utilization and uptake of macro and micronutrients in different rice cultivars. The experiment was conducted using a randomized complete-block design, with a split-plot arrangement of treatments and three replications. Four rates of Mo (0, 0.01, 0.1 and 1 mg L-1) and five cultivars (MR219, HASHEMI, MR232, FAJRE and MR253) provided the main and sub-plots, respectively. The results showed that the enhancement of Mo levels (from 0.01 to 0.1 and 0.1 to 1mg L-1) led to increase of root Mo uptake by 81.7 and 61.6% and shoot Mo uptake by 43 and 87%, respectively. Also, Mo application significantly affected shoot Phosphorus uptake so that highest shoot Phosphorus (P) uptake (0.43% plant-1) was achieved at 1mg Mo L-1 but there was no significant influence on root P uptake. Shoot Iron (Fe) uptake was inversely proportional to increment of Mo rates therefore, the highest rate of shoot Fe (59.05 μg plant-1) was obtained in treatments with least amount of applied Mo. Also, increase in Mo application enhanced manganese (Mn) uptake of shoot but there was no significant effect on Mn root uptake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher molybdenum increased rice root Mo uptake by 81.7% and 61.6% across successive rate intervals.

Treatment
enhancement of Mo levels (from 0.01 to 0.1 and 0.1 to 1mg L-1)e0
Outcome
root Mo uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
81.7 and 61.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“enhancement of Mo levels (from 0.01 to 0.1 and 0.1 to 1mg L-1) led to increase of root Mo uptake by 81.7 and 61.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher molybdenum increased rice shoot Mo uptake by 43% and 87% across successive rate intervals.

Treatment
enhancement of Mo levels (from 0.01 to 0.1 and 0.1 to 1mg L-1)e0
Outcome
shoot Mo uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
43 and 87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“enhancement of Mo levels (from 0.01 to 0.1 and 0.1 to 1mg L-1) led to increase of root Mo uptake by 81.7 and 61.6% and shoot Mo uptake by 43 and 87%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot phosphorus uptake was highest at 1mg Mo L-1.

Treatment
1mg Mo L-1e0
Outcome
shoot Phosphorus (P) uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.43% plant-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest shoot Phosphorus (P) uptake (0.43% plant-1) was achieved at 1mg Mo L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum application had no significant influence on rice root phosphorus uptake.

Treatment
Mo applicatione1
Outcome
root P uptakee0
Direction
no significant influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was no significant influence on root P uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–854 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mo application significantly affected shoot Phosphorus uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–711 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot iron uptake decreased with increasing Mo rates.

Treatment
Mo ratese0
Outcome
Shoot Iron (Fe) uptakee0
Direction
inversely proportionale0
Value
59.05 μg plant-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Shoot Iron (Fe) uptake was inversely proportional to increment of Mo rates therefore, the highest rate of shoot Fe (59.05 μg plant-1) was obtained in treatments with least amount of applied Mo.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased Mo application enhanced rice shoot manganese uptake.

Treatment
Mo applicatione0
Outcome
manganese (Mn) uptake of shoote0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“increase in Mo application enhanced manganese (Mn) uptake of shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mo application had no significant effect on rice root manganese uptake.

Treatment
Mo applicatione1
Outcome
Mn root uptakee0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was no significant effect on Mn root uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1176 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in Mo application enhanced manganese (Mn) uptake of shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1122 · show in text ↑

molybdenum atom · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.