Paper · 2012 · Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences

Effect of Application of Plant Growth Regulators on Earias vittella (Fabricius), Infestation and Yield Components of Cotton

S. Shahzad Ali; G.H. Abro; M.A. Rustamani; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
7
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies were carried out on the effect of plant growth regulators on bollworm infestation and plant growth of cotton under field conditions. New cotton variety (CRIS-134) was sown in randomized block design with seven treatments including control (check) and was replicated three times on May 22, 2004. Mepiquate chloride, Acetyl salicylic acid and Naphthalene acetic acid (plant growth regulators) were applied on 10th, 25th August and 9thSeptember 2004.The results indicated that there was no significant effect of either removal of leaves and fruiting bodies of cotton plant and application of plant growth regulators on cotton plant height but significantly effect on volume of bolls and yield in comparison to control. Moreover, application of hormones significantly delayed the maturity of cotton. There was also significant effect of application of plant growth regulators on bollworm infestation compared with control treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth regulator application did not significantly change cotton plant height compared with control.

Treatment
application of plant growth regulatorse1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Studies were carried out on the effect of plant growth regulators on bollworm infestation and plant growth of cotton under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results indicated that there was no significant effect of either removal of leaves and fruiting bodies of cotton plant and application of plant growth regulators on cotton plant height but significantly effect on volume of bolls and yield in comparison to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth regulator application significantly affected boll volume and yield of cotton compared with control.

Treatment
application of plant growth regulatorse1
Outcome
volume of bolls and yielde1
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Studies were carried out on the effect of plant growth regulators on bollworm infestation and plant growth of cotton under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results indicated that there was no significant effect of either removal of leaves and fruiting bodies of cotton plant and application of plant growth regulators on cotton plant height but significantly effect on volume of bolls and yield in comparison to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of hormones significantly delayed the maturity of cotton.

Treatment
application of hormonese2
Outcome
maturitye2
Direction
delayede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Studies were carried out on the effect of plant growth regulators on bollworm infestation and plant growth of cotton under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of hormones significantly delayed the maturity of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth regulator application significantly affected bollworm infestation compared with control treatments.

Treatment
application of plant growth regulatorse3
Interactor
bollwormHelicoverpa zeae3pest
Outcome
bollworm infestatione3
Comparator
control treatmentse3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Studies were carried out on the effect of plant growth regulators on bollworm infestation and plant growth of cotton under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
e3

“There was also significant effect of application of plant growth regulators on bollworm infestation compared with control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–936 · show in text ↑

class · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.