Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during kharif season 2010 and 2011 on sandy loam soil. The treatments comprises having two land configurations (Flat bed and raised bed) and five nutrient management options (control, PSB alone, 100% RDF, 50% RDF+PSB and 100% RDF+PSB) were tested in factorial randomized design with three replication. Results indicated that raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method. Similarly 100% RDF + PSB produces highest values of all the above parameters than rest of the treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased plant height relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbean
Vigna mungot0 - Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 63.8 cme0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased dry weight/plant relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- dry weight/plante0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 14.2 ge0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased LAI at 60 DAS relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- LAI at 60 DASe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 3.58e0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased number of root nodules/plant relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- number of root nodules/plante0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 29.7e0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased pods/plants relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- pods/plantse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 19.7e0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased seeds/pod relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- seeds/pode0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 5.0e0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased test weight relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- test weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 42.5 ge0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased grain yield relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 9.8 q/hae0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased protein content relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 21.4 %e0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased protein yield relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- protein yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 209.9 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased organic carbon relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- organic carbone0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 0.575 %e0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased available nitrogen relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- available nitrogene0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 225.4 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased phosphorus relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- phosphoruse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 16.9 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased potassium relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- potassiume0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 249.2 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased net return/ha relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- net return/hae0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- Rs 13200e0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased B:C ratio relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.55e0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased production efficiency relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- production efficiencye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 12.3 kg/day/hae0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed planting increased economic efficiency relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- raised bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- economic efficiencye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 165 Rs/day/hae0
- Comparator
- flat bed methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“raised bed planting recorded higher mean growth attributes viz., plant height (63.8 cm), dry weight/plant (14.2 g), LAI at 60 DAS (3.58), number of root nodules/plant (29.7), yield attributing component and yield viz., pods/plants (19.7), seeds/pod (5.0) and test weight (42.5 g), grain yield (9.8 q/ha), quality parameters viz., protein content (21.4 %) and protein yield (209.9 kg/ha), total nutrients uptake, available soil nutrients status viz., organic carbon (0.575 %), available nitrogen (225.4 kg/ha), phosphorus (16.9 kg/ha) and potassium (249.2 kg/ha) and economics viz., net return/ha (Rs 13200), B:C ratio (1.55), production efficiency (12.3 kg/day/ha) and economic efficiency (165 Rs/day/ha) as compared to flat bed method.”
t0“urdbean”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →tillage · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
tillage · soil: chemistry · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.